Answer:It temporarily allowed some private ownership of land in the Soviet Union.
Explanation:
Answer:
B
Explanation:
owning property is the answer trust me
pls put me brainliest
Explanation:
1. I <u>agree </u>with the Sitting Bull's quote. It makes me feel a bit upset, Sitting Bull conveyed great emotion within the 8 sentence that are there.
2. I do <u>not </u>think western settlers could have coexisted with tribes they encountered due to how persistent Sitting Bull was for fighting for the Native American's freedom from the Western Settlers.
3. I do <u>not </u>think Native Americans should have been put on reservations. The Native Americans were there before the Western Settlers were, this is their land.
4. No, I do <u>not </u>think Native Americans should have adapted to settler ways. Native Americans have their own culture which the settlers should not intervene with.
5. The settlers and federal government was <u>not</u> within their rights to conquer Native Americans and take their homelands. The Native Americans have their own rights just as much the settlers did. The homelands were where they lived. They were not above the Native Americans.
Answer:
The gold of the trust-busting in the early 1900s was eliminate or regulate those business, which due to their increasing fraudulent actions like intimidation and bribing, were becoming and impediment to a free market economy.
Explanation:
Based on the fact that this relates to Texas, the most likely reason for the change is D. The relocation of businesses.
<h3>Why would businesses relocate to Texas?</h3>
The table is not included but based on the fact that the question is about Texas, business relocation is most likely the answer.
Texas has tax friendly policies and a lower cost of living which has led to many companies moving there. This has increased the economic power of Texas.
Find out more on the economy of Texas at brainly.com/question/24556807.
#SPJ1
