Answer:
Explanation:The conventional wisdom has generally been that for better or for worse it was an anti-war influence. It brought the “horror of war” night after night into people's living rooms and eventually inspired revulsion and exhaustion.
There are a couple of differences:
1) The Americas (especially Latin America), will not have Roman Catholic influences in the area, and will not have it as their state religion.
2) The land will keep most of it's natural wealth, though it may not be used in great quantities as before.
3) Population will not take a hit, and will continue to grow, as European diseases are not spread to them. However, if trading occurs between the north-eastern tribes all the way down to Central America, they will still be exposed to diseases carried by the French and British.
4) They may not be exposed to the usage of firearms as quickly, which may lead to their demise to their native enemies. Firearms, while they took very long to reload back then, was a symbol of power and was used more as a shock then as a weapon (until the mini-ball, repeater, and other upgrades to the rifle came).
5) The other way to look at it is that another European Power may take over those lands. The first of which is Portugal, whose lands were very near the Spanish territory. The next in line would be France, which borders the Spanish territories, and than Britain.
~
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Depending on the crime yes, major crimes are usually the only time a person would be killed that way, giving the pain it is valid for the major crime. Doctors should be present when administrated.
The correct answer is A. It can be more responsive to the interests of citizens.
Explanation
Direct democracy is a form of government in which all members of a community/country/state actively participate in all decisions made there. On the other hand, there is indirect democracy, the evolution of direct democracy, in it, the decisions depend on a group of representatives elected by citizens, this modality of democracy has been adopted in most modern states.
Direct democracy has advantages over indirect democracy because it better responds to the interests of citizens as each of them will actively participate in the government, thus allowing decisions to be made and ensuring that their interests are taken into account. On the other hand, in indirect democracy, once you elect your representative, you have no direct control over the decisions he makes, regardless of whether they go against your interests. Therefore, the correct answer is A. It can be more responsive to the interests of citizens.
Answer:
In my opinion racism against African Americans have been increasingly changing, like from just last year George floyd whom which had a daughter and mother he was loved and he repeatedly said " I can't breath!" A white cop had him pinned down with his knee on his neck. After he repeatedly said "I can't breathe!" The white cop refused to get off of him and surely he died because the ignorance of racism towards colored people.Some things that improved is that it's not as bad as it used to be though black people are still dying because of racism . It's had seffently got better.
Explanation:
