1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lemur [1.5K]
3 years ago
13

Write an editorial that responds to George Washington's Farewell Address. Explain whether or not you think Washington was correc

t in warning Americans against political parties and alliances. This must two paragraphs 5 sentences each please help meee
History
1 answer:
nikitadnepr [17]3 years ago
3 0
In my opinion, George Washington's Farewell Address was a fair and clear warning against political parties/alliances. The reason being is because, having all these alliances and political parties would cause a war. If everyone stated their opinions, and someone doesn't like it, then they will fight about it until the conflict is resolved. Republicans formed a number of societies and clubs throughout the nation, which spread criticism of Washington's political decisions. This caused the birth of the Republican Party after Thomas Jefferson resigned from Washington's cabinet. Washington was against the Federalists which caused a little conflict with the Republican Party. Further more, more evidence provides that Washington's address was a fair warning, due to the fact that more conflict grew in his later term of presidency. Battles raged in the press, attacking one's political views. All in all, i would say that Washington's Farewell Address was a fair, and clear warning. It was correct in my opinion. hope this helped, have an amazing day :)<span />
You might be interested in
Which was NOT a key feature of feudal Japan? a. Centralized government was modeled on Chinese bureaucracy. b. Elaborate protocol
ahrayia [7]
D. Provincial lords held all economic and political power is not a key feature of feudal Japan. The Shogun was the military ruler and under him came various local leaders (daimyo) and then the samurai, which was the warrior class.
3 0
4 years ago
Which of the following is an example of a pull?
Aneli [31]

Answer:

Reeling in a fish with a fishing pole R1CO95- Playing Tug Of War.

7 0
3 years ago
What is most important in a representative democracy?
tamaranim1 [39]
The representation is extremely needed for a representative democracy to work. Democracy means "people's rule". The people's place in the democracy is very important. 
4 0
3 years ago
What was the primary incentive for the implementation of the marshall plan
____ [38]

<span>The primary incentive for the implementation of the Marshall Plan was that American leaders hoped that U.S. economic assistance would prevent Europeans from turning to Communism. In 1948, this plans was enacted by the 80th United States Congress as the response to the European financial crisis that took place a year before. It was an act of  economic aid to Western Europe that was meant to help rebuild economies that crashed during the World War II. The main goals were: to erase trade barriers, enact the modernisation of industry and to prevent the spread of Communism.</span>

4 0
3 years ago
Why did the Kulak class, in particular, oppose collectivization? A. They opposed modernization and machines and clung to old far
madam [21]

Answer:

B. They were wealthier than other peasants and therefore had the most to lose.

Explanation:

Explanation:

By 1917 in Russia emerged a wealthy and prosperous peasant class who was characterized by owning large farms and agricultural areas. They also had access to cattle and all types of agricultural business. They were so powerful that Kulaks even lent money and played an important social role in Russian society.  

In 1927 the Soviet powers to be and political class started a change in the peasant policy in which it was necessary to have a more demanding tax policy on Kulaks and Kulaks also had to be restricted regarding their right to lease lands. Obviously it was a policy Kulak class was against for because such a policy represented the beginning of the "Collectivization" of agriculture so they pressed very hard to discourage this government new policy. In the end of 1929 the Soviet government successfully launched a campaign of "dekulakization" and approximately 75% of farms in the Soviet Union entered in the collectivization policy.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In franz Kafka the metamorphosis, Gregor still has human feelings and sensations even though he's a bug. At one point, he wishes
    9·1 answer
  • This was a United States general who served as chief of staff and commanded Allied forces in the South Pacific during World War
    8·2 answers
  • On his third missionary journey Paul spent two years in: jail Athens Ephesus Jerusalem
    13·1 answer
  • What impact did the Congress of Vienna have on Europe?
    10·2 answers
  • The area in red in the map shown shows a South east Asian country who is conflict between northern communist in southern nine co
    5·1 answer
  • Help in your own words <br> How would you improve our educational system?
    6·2 answers
  • Why was Lincoln’s election important
    8·1 answer
  • I really need this!! Please help! I chose D, is this right?!
    6·2 answers
  • What did england sell to africa
    11·1 answer
  • The death of Charles I was significant because:
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!