All categories

4 years ago

The Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine called for

History

2 answers:

Mazyrski [523]4 years ago

7 0

The answer is D for this question.

Margaret [11]4 years ago

4 0

Answer: D) Intervening in Latin American countries that could not pay their debt to European creditors.

Explanation:

The Roosevelt Corollary was set forth by President Theodore Roosevelt in 1904 (in his State of the Union Address that year). It was a tweaking of the Monroe Doctrine. The Monroe Doctrine expressed US opposition to European interference in the Americas. Roosevelt's corollary to that doctrine was that the United States would intervene in conflicts between European countries and Latin American countries, rather than having the Europeans press their claims directly.

The issue that started this concern was a financial crisis in the Dominican Republic, whose government had stopped payments on millions of dollars in debt to various nations. There was concern that European powers would seek to come to the Western Hemisphere to collect debts and then maybe also set themselves up as occupying powers in countries in the region.

You might be interested in

What was the relationship between the Yamato imperial family and the Minamoto family’s military government?

Misha Larkins [42]

The relationship between the Yamato imperial family and the Minamoto family’s military government was D. The Yamato family formally served as part of the Minamoto military.

<h3>What is a Military Government?</h3>

This refers to the type of government that is comprised of military members that rule and governs a group of people or a country and is usually an authoritarian government.

Hence, we can see that historically speaking, the Minamoto family's military government was a military dictatorship, and the relationship that existed between the Yamato imperial family and the Minamoto family’s military government was that the Yamato family formally served as part of the Minamoto military.

Read more about military governments here:

brainly.com/question/525279

#SPJ1

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How did the byzantine empire last so long?

egoroff_w [7]

There were many factors that allowed the Byzantine Empire to last a 1000 years after the end of the Roman Empire which include the fact that Constantinople, the capital of the Byzantine Empire, was protected with walls that lasted almost the entire 1000 years, making Constantinople, and the center of the empire's economy/culture impervious to invaders.

5 0

3 years ago

What event took place during the forth crusade?

Kryger [21]

jerusalem took christian control :) (brainliest ?)

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Claim: Australia and New Zealand were more successful than other British colonies in gaining independence.

Mila [183]

Answer:

A. Close proximity among Australia, New Zealand, and Britain allowed for easy communication and negotiation.

Explanation:

Considering the claim stated in the question, hence, among the following options, the statement that could be used as evidence in support of the claim that "Australia and New Zealand were more successful than other British colonies in gaining independence." is option A "Close proximity among Australia, New Zealand, and Britain allowed for easy communication and negotiation."

This is because a CLOSE PROXIMITY between Great Britain, Australia, and New Zealand means these countries or colonies have a good rapport with Great Britain. Therefore, it was easier to negotiate their independence instead of going to war (for example USA) or series of agitation and protest to get their independence (for example India)

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the answer? please help me

Gala2k [10]

I believe it’s the first answer

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers