<h3>2
Answers: </h3><h3>
Choice B) Shift down</h3><h3>
Choice C) Shift right</h3>
===================================================
Explanation:
Start with the point (-2,-4). Let's try to move it to (2, -9)
To do so, we need to shift down and to the right (in either order).
Specifically we shift 4 units to the right to go from x=-2 to x=4
Note how x=-2 moves to x+4 = -2+4 = 2
Also, we shift 5 units down. We have y = -4 turn into y = -9 as shown below
y ---> y-5 = -4-5 = -9
So the translation rule is 
Let's see what happens when we apply the translation rule to (2,4)

which is the other endpoint of the blue segment. This shows that the translation rule works for (2,4) to move to (6,-1)
We do not apply any dilations. The red and blue segments are the same length because translations preserve distance. All we're effectively doing is moving the red segment to land on the blue segment. This means no vertical or horizontal stretches are done. The same can be said about compressions as well.

The right fraction represents the percentage; 42 over 100 (100 is the total), or 0.42.
The left fraction is the part number over the whole number. The whole number is unknown, so we use 'x'.
Your answer is 75.
You multiply 12x8.3 and get the answer 100
Answer:
90.31 is greater than 90.302
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Sally is not right
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the two sequences which have their respective
terms as following:
Sequence A. 
Sequence B. 
As per Sally, there exists only one number which is in both the sequences.
To find:
Whether Sally is correct or not.
Solution:
For Sally to be correct, we need to put the
terms of the respective sequences as equal and let us verify that.

When we talk about
terms,
here is a whole number not a fractional number.
But as per the statement as stated by Sally
is a fractional number, only then the two sequences can have a number which is in the both sequences.
Therefore, no number can be in both the sequences A and B.
Hence, Sally is not right.