Television, telephones, cellular devices, and violent video games. They tried to solve the problem by restricting the amount of games they can buy and parents limiting time on devices.
1. According to Atticus, the Cunninghams family are a group of 'proud people'. They work really hard for their allowance, follow the law, and take care of the people around them. The ewells on the other hand, are filled with law breakers and entitled people who believe they could do whatever they pleases.
2. No. Eventhough the Ewells is indeed poor, the town do not treat them as commonfolk.
The regulators in the city know that if they do not bend the rules for Bob Ewell, he is cruel enough to let his children starve to death.
3. Both of the cunninghams and the Ewell are considered poor. But the cunninghams are considered even more poor than the Ewells.
The Finch family is not particularly rich, but they are considerably more well-off compared to cunninghams and Ewell.
4. It is how Atticus see the attittude of both families. Despite being poor, The cunninghams keep their human dignity and always try their best to become decent citizens, the Ewell on the other hand are really lazy and always break the law.
<h3>
<em>Shahab-ud-din Muhammad Khurram[3] (5 January 1592 – 22 January 1666),[7] better known by his regnal name Shah Jahan (Persian: "King of the World"),[8] was the fifth Mughal emperor, who reigned from 1628 to 1658.[9] He is widely considered one of the greatest Mughal emperors; under his reign the Mughal Empire reached the peak of its glory.[10] Although an able military commander, Shah Jahan is perhaps best remembered for his architectural achievements. His reign ushered in the golden age of Mughal architecture. Shah Jahan commissioned many monuments, the best known of which is the Taj Mahal in Agra, which entombs his favourite wife, Mumtaz Mahal. His relationship with Mumtaz Mahal has been heavily adapted into Indian art, literature, and cinema.</em></h3>
<em>Hope</em><em> </em><em>it</em><em> </em><em>helps</em><em> </em><em>you</em>
Answer:
stare decisis
Explanation:
In law, stare decisis can be described as a situation in which historical cases are used for forming a rule when a similar case is seen. In this type of system, rules are formed in consideration of the previous rules which were acknowledged for a similar case. Stare decisis simply means to stand by what is already decided. The principle of stare decisis is the core of U.S common law. All court relies on U.S supreme court precedents.
The largest body of water in the state of Mississippi is Grenada Lake
