For some, Open Mic Night at the local bar might conjure up some pretty bad memories - random people yacking about this or that, one minute a guy tells you about the novel ways to trim your hedges into the likes of farm animals, while another talks about his belief that aliens live amongst us. You and your buddies roll your eyes and dash for the door. And this is for good reason! Neither speaker took the time to consider some very important things.
You see, when a speechwriter sets out to draft a winning speech, he not only considers the topic - he thinks about the speaker, audience and purpose of the speech. Why, you ask? He does this mostly to keep the attention and interest of his audience. Let's take a closer look at this.
Because they wanted To make poems easier to say and remember
question answered by
(jacemorris04)
"In Flanders Fields" and "Dulce et Decorum Est!" both use the same event but they reveal completely different views of World War 1. In the first mentioned story author shows his respect to those who was fighting for their country and future generations, persuading the reader to feel the same and to be ready to protect their motherland. Author of the second story describes all the frightening moments of war and convinces the readers that it if they had to stand on the front line it would be the worst experience in their life. So, In Flanders Fields" eulogize war while "Dulce et Decorum Est!" warrns against it.
If you could insert a picture that has the full question, you could get a more reliable answer.
Answer:
fear = prejudice = unfair treatment
Explanation:
due to disproportionate rates of crime in black communities, many black kids are unfortunately labeled as being more likely to be untrustworthy and/or violent. This causes a general sense of unease in the prejudiced party, making them more likely to report and punish the black kid for a disproportionate offense.
This is a pattern that can be seen in any marginalized community, and frankly, the colour of one's skin is not the factor at play. This happens to LGBT people, immigrants of any colour, it can happen to any group which is stereotyped as being dangerous in some capacity.
This is where we get into the concept of intersectionality, such as how a black person can oppress a white lgbt person, and so on and so forth. It's all relative to the specific situation at hand.
