This is straight from the internet, "<span>The </span>causes<span> of the </span>fall of the Soviet Union<span> were many and included ethnic conflict, a lack of support for the idea of communism and economic troubles </span>caused<span> by a focus on arms. Despite reform efforts by Mikhail Gorbachev, the then leader of the</span>Soviet Union<span>, the country was never able to reorganize and rebuild."</span>
The theories of Hamilton are most persuasive when upholding Legal procedure.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
One of its main themes of the Washington government was the clash between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson on the organization of a two-party system,
Hamilton's strategy for the National Bank formed a controversy along the same lines,
Hamilton and the Federalists supporting the National Bank, while Jefferson and the Democratic-Republicans opposed it.
This makes sense to give Parliament the freedom to act and understanding necessary to deal with different situations.
Yet, as Jefferson suggests, the laws that grant Congress so much authority if the legal system shall not be upheld. Recall that for Jefferson he advocated the Constitution's act, so the clause was not as meaningful for him as the Amendment could be amended to respond to new needs.
Salvatore Ferrara made the first jaw breaker
The answer is A, which is the first choice
<span>During the Bill Clinton administration, no-fly zones in the north and south of Iraq kept Saddam’s aircraft grounded in an effort to protect the Kurds and Shias. In February 1998, Secretary of State Madeleine Albright confirmed that U.S. strategy toward Saddam was containment, arguing that removing Saddam would be too costly and that fomenting a coup would create false expectations.6
</span>
