Main idea is dogs do not need to be able to speak to communicate and the supporting details are the examples given to prove they don’t need words to communicate EX: facial expressions, sounds, eyes, posture.
B is the answer cause I had this test.
Hope this helps have a great rest of ur day
The correct answer is B. by changing "to drive" to "driving." In order
for a construction to be parallel to another one, they have to have the
same form. So, if one part of a construction is using the gerund form
(reading my mom's list of instructions), then the other part has to end
in -ing as well in order for them to be parallel. So, if you change the
infinitive "to drive" to the gerund form "driving," you will create
parallel constructions.
It seems right that a person that it's supposed to be helping us feel safe and that his main job is protect and serve, when we can prove of his wrongdoings, receives a harsher sentence that a person that doesn't work as a police officer. A criminal often times does it out of neccesity, because he'd grown up in a type of environment that he doesn't know any better. His chances at succeding in life are often limited by the same place and community that he grew up in. While it may seems true for a police officer to come from a bad neighborhood, it's also true that he went through training and education where he knows what's right or wrong, he doesn't have the need to steal because he has a steady job.
