Read the argument below:

2 answers:

7 0

I would say D. It wasn't logical, he assumed too quickly. It does not go back into the question to delve for answers, and the argument is not necessarily "non-sequitur" or invalid.

The writer assumed that since everyone likes it, it will have a good effect on the school. He concluded that from one piece of evidence, supporting his hastiness.

den301095 [7]2 years ago

6 0

answer D. hasty generalization, is correct for apex!

You might be interested in

Surrender Speech

Ghella [55]

I would go with option d)

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

When an author uses actions, thoughts, and speech to show the reader who a character is,

zimovet [89]

Answer:

Indirect characterization

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Imagine a world where people can know what others are thinking. What conflict would cease to exist in that world? What new confl

pentagon [3]

Answer:

This would solve the problem of false testimony and lying, but this could cause privacy issues. People would probably talk a lot less and read minds a lot more.

Explanation:

These are just some ideas, you are going to have to write this yourself, but this can help you get started.

5 0

3 years ago

What is this type of animal it is called a cameleon i dont really know how to spell it sorry?

timurjin [86]

Reptile i think hope this helped

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which excerpt is the best example of an appeal to logos?

Georgia [21]

B. Biofuels transferred over 100 million tons of cereals from plates to petrol tanks: to fill a 4 x 4 tank requires enough grain to feed a poor person for a year."

By saying this he uses logos, or logical reasoning by presenting facts and hard numbers the author makes the reader see how much is wasted or is used to fill a tank, is enough to end poverty worldwide.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers