Answer:
B. the pain of losing $1,000 on a bet exceeds the pleasure of winning $1,000 on a bet.
Explanation:
A risk averse person is an individual or person rather who prefers lower returns with known risk than higher returns with unknown or higher risks. In this case, the individual prioritizes preservation of capital at hand over the potential of a more than average return. In this scenario, for a risk averse individual, the pain of losing $1,000 on a bet exceeds the pleasure of winning $1,000 on a bet based on the high uncertainty attached to winning the $1000 bet.
Answer:
I think it easier in person
Explanation:
This is due to the fact that I can see the people and can understand if people are paying attention or if I need to alter the material a bit.
What do you need help with?
Answer:
Part A)
Inflation Rate = 12% - 4%
Inflation rate = 8%
Part B)
If the genuine income was higher, the expansion level would diminish subject to the buyer's spending limitations. As such, they will make a similar measure of cash yet their buying power per dollar will increase.
Part C)
in the current scenario, increment in cash would cause the expansion rate to increment. On the off chance that we consider the past and occasions, for example, hyperinflation, take a gander at what the reason was. Governments were printing cash to pay obligations, which was diminishing the estimation of their money. Right now, would get paid and race to the store to go through their cash in light of the fact that their dollars today may just be worth 50 pennies tomorrow or at times, the following hour. Thus, our answer is if the speed of cash continues developing, expansion will continue developing also. These two factors are star repetitive with one another significance they move together.