Answer:
The most effective advertising is very expensive and, therefore, wasteful.
Explanation:
In order for something to be considered economically wasteful it must use and dispose money carelessly.
Therefore options:
- Advertising provides consumers with price and quality information about products.
- Advertising manipulates people's tastes and can reduce competition.
Do not apply since the options do not consider the costs of advertisement.
The only option that considers the cost of advertisement is: The most effective advertising is very expensive and, therefore, wasteful. It refers to the high costs of effective advertisement, and it implies that the money is not used carefully.
Answer:
a) 25,000
Explanation:
The computation of the economic profit is shown below;
Economic profit is
= Revenue - Explicit cost - Implicit cost
= $550,000 - $500,000 - $500,000 × 5%
= $550,000 - $500,000 - $25000
= $25,000
Hence, the economic profit on this deal was $25,000
Therefore the correct option is a.
We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come
And, the same is to be considered
Explanation:
Area = Area of sides + area of semicircle thing
= (2*0.21*0.31) + (2*0.31*0.61) + (0.21*0.61) + ( 3.14*0.105*0.61) + (3.14*0.105*0.105) = 0.872 m^2
Total area = 0.872 *1106 =964.43 m^2
Answer =965 m^2
One advantage of modularization is that it simplifies its own manufacturing systems. With this, companies can separate their material cost and product development, and they can also optimize their total product cost through increasing the potential of the variety of products, having a fast product development and upgrade, having a better time-to-market, service support, aftermarket, and lastly, enabling continuous market and product improvement.
Answer:
The correct answer is: Assumption of the risk.
Explanation:
If the risk inherent in a particular action that caused an injury is knowingly and voluntarily assumed, you cannot sue anyone to recover the damages. Suppose, for example, a situation in which he went to a friend's house and was warned about the use of the back door because the floor cover was seriously damaged and would not support a person's weight on it. If you have decided to ignore the warning and use the back door, the doctrine of risk taking will probably prevent the recovery of injuries sustained by a fall on that floor. The court will decide that you "assumed the risk" of such injury.
