1. What ideas came from the Magna Carta?

1 answer:

6 0

1. Trial by Jury and Rule of Law

2. Self Government is a natural right and that they shouldn’t have a monarchy, instead a representative government

3. Establish Justice, promote the general welfare, insure domestic tranquillity, provide for the common defense, secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity

4. The First Article is about the Legislative Branch. Congress is a part of the Legislative Branch, and the Senate and House of Representatives make up Congress. Theta have the power to create laws and bills

The Second Article is about the Executive Branch. Members that make up the Executive Branch are the President, Vice President, and the Cabinet. They execute or enforce the laws.

The 3rd Article is about the Judicial Branch. The Judicial Branch made up by the Courts and Supreme Court. They interpret the law.

You might be interested in

Why is their no mouse flavord cat food

Sonja [21]

Answer:there is

Explanation:

not many companies do this due because a lot mouse and rats come with many unknow bacteria. you can find some but rarely

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A case has reached the Supreme Court, but not as a matter of appeal. How did it most likely get there

slava [35]

Answer:

Invoking original jurisdiction is the only nonappeal way in which cases can reach the Court.

Explanation:

.....

3 0

2 years ago

determine what type of evidence the following may be: A man holding a book of matches at the scene of a fire

Nookie1986 [14]

Answer:

Well, The only specific evidence we have at the current scene would be that man that has a book of matches but sense we cant really determine whether or not he was the one who did it, therefore we have no exponential evidence that he did it.

Explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

A debt issued by a company as a negotiable instrument with a term of 9 months or less is a security that is exempt from registra

Tomtit [17]

The answer would be B

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Do you think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted? Or do you think a lesser burde

BigorU [14]

I think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted is more appropriate.

<h3>Who is a Defendant?</h3>

This is referred to as the individual or group which have been accused of breaking the law and is being tried in court.

It is more appropriate for the defendants to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted because the jury will employ the use of evidences and testimonies in other to give a verdict. This ensures fair judgement and prevent innocent from being punished unjustly.

Read more about Defendant here brainly.com/question/7315287

#SPJ1

5 0

1 year ago