B I believe is the answer :)
Answer:
It is that all the facts in the pleadings are true and to apply the law to those facts.
Explanation:
Physiology of an individual.
Answer: violated the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection clause
Explanation:
Plessy claimed the law violated the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection clause, which requires that a state must not “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” The Supreme Court disagreed with Plessy's argument and instead upheld the Louisiana law.
Answer and explanation:
In order to facilitate this legal process, and considering the situation presented, the best option would be a <u>joint tenancy</u>. <u>Joint tenancy</u> is a legal proccedure that indicates that when there is more than one owner of a property, all of them have equal rights on said place. In this case joint tenancy claims survivorship rights so that the remaining child will increase their percentage ownership.
