<em>"The Electoral College", </em>set out in Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, allows states to have the same power of votes in spite of their number of population.
Due to that, a party could outcast the presidential candidate they don't want, even if such candidate was elected by the majority.
The parties nominate electors, usually by a central committee or the conventions; so when voters cast their ballot for President, they are actually voting for their <em>"State's Electors"</em>, who are not obliged to follow the results of the popular vote, thus sometimes <em>“faithless electors”</em> adversely choose a candidate they're not committed to.
A <em>"faithless elector</em><em>"</em> is simply a member of the "<em>Electoral College</em>" who votes against the party's candidate.
Thereby the answer is (B): <em>"It allows for faithless electors, or electors who do not vote according to the wishes of their states"</em>
That statement is false
The one that used a "big government" argument was the Republican party.
According to them, Universal health care reform will require the Government taking too much control of several economic freedom. For example, it requires the Government to Mandate what and which kind of insurance that the people have to buy.
Answer:
Human capital is the load of propensities, information, social and character credits (counting imagination) exemplified in the capacity to perform work to deliver financial worth.
Human capital is interesting and contrasts from some other capital. It is required for organizations to accomplish objectives, create and stay imaginative. Organizations can put resources into human capital, for instance, through schooling and preparing, empowering improved degrees of value and creation.
Human capital theory is firmly connected with the investigation of human resources management, as found in the act of business organization and macroeconomics.
Explanation:
The first thought of human capital can be followed back in any event to Adam Smith in the eighteenth century. The advanced theory was promoted by Gary Becker, a financial specialist and Nobel Laureate from the College of Chicago, Jacob Mincer, and Theodore Schultz. Because of his conceptualization and demonstrating work using Human capital as a key factor, the 2018 Nobel Prize for Financial matters was mutually granted to Paul Romer, who established the cutting edge development driven way to deal with understanding monetary development.
