The sentence that best integrates information from two sources is "While one article claims that climate change does not affect sea levels, another article shows ..."
<h3>How to integrate two or more sources?</h3>
In writing, integrating sources implies using different reliable sources to support an idea or better explain an issue. If sources present contradictory information, the best is to:
- Briefly state the idea each source supports to show the contradiction between sources.
- Mention the type of source in each case (book, article, blog, etc.).
<h3>What is the best option?</h3>
The best option to integrate the two sources is "While one article claims that climate change does not affect sea levels, another article shows examples of U.S. states..."
The main reasons are:
- This mentions the type of sources (articles).
- This states why these are contradictory rather than only mentioning they have opposite information.
Learn more about reliable sources in: brainly.com/question/12203238
Answer:
cheerful
Explanation:
The character is being witty, for sure, but the character is also responding to the first comment <em>"Well, let's try and have a find time"</em>. There's nothing specially clever in what was said. It is even a bit silly, but that is the point, since the character is clearly trying to be humorous in order to have <em>"a fine time"</em>.
Yes because he thought the humans were the bad guys.
C) A constellation is a group of stars. Is not a fragment
Answer:
d. gadflies
Explanation:
In his famous letter from Birmingham City Jail, Martin Luther King Jr. wrote:
<em>“...we must see the need of having nonviolent </em><em>gadflies </em><em>to create the kind of tension in society that will help men rise from the dark depths of prejudice and racism to the majestic heights of understanding and brotherhood”</em>
<em />
Gadfly is an established metaphor for the person that doesn’t take the status quo as such and tries to bring the change and the novelty into the society, usually by standing up to the authorities in the process.
Using the gadfly metaphor, King expresses the importance of standing up to the established rules of the society and<u> creating tension that has to end up in change</u>. The tension he calls for is <u>nonviolent and interference to the authority</u>, but impossible to ignore. <u>He is, therefore, calling for nonviolent civil disobedience that will challenge the racial prejudices, and finally abolish them.</u>
