Project manager in a functional matrix had more lesser influence over one in a dedicated project team because:
- the dedicated team allows a formal authority over the participants
- the dedicated team offers a greater access to influence currencies than the project manager in a functional matrix.
<h3>Who is a Project manager?</h3>
A Project manager is a manager with the responsibiltiy of planning, organizing and directing the completion of specific projects for such organization.
<em />
In conclusion, in a functional matrix, the manager sdoes compensate for their lack of formal authority by exercising informal influence through the use of relationships and personal <em>currencies.</em>
<em />
<em />
Read more about Project manager
<em>brainly.com/question/6500846</em>
The two primary factors affecting an entrepreneur choice of legal ownership for a venture are TAXES AND LEGAL LIABILITY.
The type of business that an entrepreneur establish will determine the type and the amount of tax that it will be required to pay. The legal liability of the entrepreneur determines the extent to which he can be liable in case he finds himself in a financial mess. The entrepreneur should try and minimize the impacts of these two factors.
Answer:
a. There are significant differences in incomes between high- and low-income countries.
Explanation:
Data provided in the question
Per person GDP in Singapore = $53,591
Per person GDP in Egypt = $5,547
Based on the above information
As we can see that the level of income in Singapore is higher than Egypt also when there is an important difference in the high income and low income countries the same is shown accurately
hence, the correct option is a.
Answer:
$1,500
Explanation:
Given the compounding formula 
And given an investment (P), made at 16% compounded annually (r), and an ending amount of $1,740 (A) at the end of the year (n = 1 year), the original amount invested (P) can be computed as follows.
= P = 1,740/1.16 = 1,500.
Therefore, the original investment was $1,500.
Answer:
D. No loss recognized and a reduction in E&P of $200,000
Explanation:
Given that:
- Current and accumulated E&P : $500,000
- A distribution of land to its sole shareholder: $200,000
- E&P basis to Catamount : $250,000
From that, we can see that the current and accumulated E&P is greater than its distribution of land so no loss would be reported so there will be reduction in earning and profits of the company of $200,000.
Hope it will find you well.
