Answer: The answer is hindsight bias
Explanation:
Hindsight bias : This can be defined as a situation whereby a person forecast the consequence of an event that could happened in the future which eventually happened exactly the way the person had forecasted the event . When an event had occurred, people tend to have the habit of saying that,they knew the consequences of the event happening before it eventually happened. This concept is applicable in the areas of sport for example when someone forecast that his football team is going to beat their opponent by two goals to one and it eventually happened the way the person had predicted it. It can also be applicable in the areas of politics, for example when someone had forecasted that the candidate for their party in the forthcoming election will win the election by a wide margin to beat the other contestant in the election, and it happened exactly the person had predicted it. Therefore, in the event described in the question, the research is known as hindsight bias.
At lamb's peace church, the music director, youth group director and the director of religious education share the services of the administrative staff. this is an example of <u>Pooled</u> interdependence.
A task circumstance in which the task is divided among a number of people, units, or groups, each of whom executes independently with little to no contact or coordination needed and no flow of work between them.
The output of each person, group, or unit is eventually combined and helps the organization as a whole achieve its overall objectives.
For instance, each employee in a company's sales department works individually throughout the day to sell a certain product, and at the end of the day, the total number of sales made by all employees is added up to provide the company's overall sales statistic.
To learn more about Pooled Interdependence here
brainly.com/question/22852957
#SPJ4
The answer is going to be c. hope that helped
There are both ethical and political reasons for wanting to address the growing gap between rich and poor, according to experts ranging from economists and political scientists to social workers and activists.
<u>Answer:</u>
The offender would stand a good chance of being caught or punished.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The theory of rational action was also called the theory of rational choice can explain the reason, which assumes that an individual has preferences among the options available that allow them to state which choice they make. It is presumed that these preferences are done (the individual can always say which of two options they find acceptable or that none is preferred to the other) and transitive (If option A is preferred to option B and option B is preferred to option C, instead option A is preferred to option C).
Here the circumstances of being caught or punished would be preferred by prompt and offender to decide forgo the crime as they have assumed to take into account available information, event chances, cost of potential and advantages in finding out the preferences, and to behave consistently in selecting the best choice of action self-determined.
