This is a very ethically question and I am not sure of the exactly correct answer but if it's open to your own answer, I took a course and there was like an answer:
So, to know if a decision or view is "good" the 4 tests of truth can be applied
1. The test of reason (is it reasonable? Can it be logically stated and defended?)
2. The test of the outer world (Is there some external, corroborating evidence to support it?)
3. The test of the inner world (Does it adequately address the "victories, disappointments, blessings, crises, and relationships of our everyday world"?
4. The test of the real world (Are its consequences good or bad when applied in any given cultural context?)
But, as it says, for this - the whole society - the test of the real word would do.
Hope this helps
Answer: i love dragons and i think they would be great if they were real. we can probaly ride them to fly places
The correct answer is both approaches are generally considered insight therapies.
Due to the fact that Freud creator of Psychoanalysis developed the idea of psychotherapy - therapy that, through speech, treats psychic problems - Psychoanalysis is considered the first school of psychotherapy.
Psychoanalysis emerged in 1901 and one of the main bases is the notion of the unconscious, understanding that unconscious issues can influence or generate current symptoms.
The role of the psychoanalyst is to help the patient to remember, recover and reintegrate unconscious materials so that the current life is more satisfying. One of the ways of working is through free association, in which the patient verbalizes everything he thinks without censorship and the psychoanalyst interprets these contents. In the course of intensive psychoanalytic treatment, the nature of relationships originating in each individual's childhood is investigated.
Humanistic psychology emerged in the 1950s and was termed as the third force of psychology, as it opposed Psychoanalysis and the behavioral approach. Humanistic psychology rejects the idea that every human being has a basic neurosis and considers that everyone has the capacity for normal growth and development.
The therapist's role then is not to direct, but to create a welcoming and empathetic environment in which the human being can develop in the direction in which he chooses and so that he can really be who he is.
Answer:
<em>Comparative politics is investigating internal processes within countries or political entities by comparing their characteristics according to a specific model.</em> Though it can potentially address a wide range of aspects, comparative politics is most widely applied to such <em>issues </em>as <u>politics of democratic and authoritarian states</u>, <u>political identit</u>y, <u>regime change</u> and <u>democratization</u>, <u>voting behavior</u> and a number of others.
<em>Comparativists often ask</em> how certain processes, for example, democratization, differ in specific states that still can be placed under the same analysis because they share certain characteristics.
Following the <u>democratization example</u>, let us take post-soviet countries. Comparativists may take most similar countries that share many similarities, such as Baltic states (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania), or most different countries, such as Estonia and Belarus. Here comparativists may ask, why Estonia developed a strong democratic regime, while Belarus fell into a consolidated authoritarian regime.
Plz translate, I’m not very flaunt in Spanish
