1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
EleoNora [17]
3 years ago
11

Explain the key difference between woodrow wilson's moral diplomacy and teddy roosevelt's "big stick" diplomacy.

History
1 answer:
max2010maxim [7]3 years ago
7 0
The “big stick” diplomacy is to speak kindly but be willing to use force And idk what the other one is but I hope it still helped!!
You might be interested in
Although women worked during World War II, what was the expectation of them once male soldiers returned home?
Bumek [7]

Answer:

They wanted to come home to a clean house and a hot meal.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Plz help with this american history questions
yuradex [85]
<span>21.  The Mayflower Compact...
C. was signed as an agreement to form a government.
</span>
<span>30. This document called for the colonists' independence from England.
B. the Articles of Confederation

</span><span>31. The ____________ was formed to address grievances of the colonists.
A, Continental Congress</span>

33. <span>Who wrote the Declaration of Independence?
</span>D. Thomas Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence. It was then adopted on July 4, 1776.

-----------------------------------

I am sorry I was unable to answer more of your questions, I was limited on time. I did try to answer as many as I could, sorry.

I hope I was still of some help, good luck!







7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which territory did the United States acquire through the Mexican-American War?
Vesnalui [34]

Which territory did the United States acquire through the Mexican-American War?

Answer:

B

B. territory C

8 0
2 years ago
Identify three documents on the timeline that are examples of social contract
Serggg [28]
So a social contract is where a "persons' moral and/or political obligations are dependent upon a contract or agreement among them to form the society in which they live".
Rousseau was most famous for coming up with the term but examples have always existed and exist right now.

An example of how a social contract works would be the legal system. For augments sake, if I say you stole all my money and you deny it, instead of fighting it out with fists or me raiding your house to find it with a gun, we both put our faith in the legal system which we both agree will be more impartial, and get to the truth. I surrender my right to take matters into my own hands on the condition that you will also do the same. Why did we do this? Because there are more benefits than not having this system in place. I may not be able to get personal revenge on you for stealing my money but I also am protected from people doing the same to me. People who are born in a state metaphorically "sign" the contract when they are born in order to live in the state.

A primitive example if you want would be that two people meet in the woods looking for berries. Both have guns and are distrustful of the other. They are constantly looking over their shoulders at each other out of fear which prevents them from going about their berry gathering. Eventually they both agree to a "contract" that they will both give up their guns at the same time. They do this because whilst you do not want to give up your gun, it means that you don't have to worry about getting shot in the back so times are more productive.
The theory is the same even if people disagree on why social contracts exist. Folk like Rousseau thought that social contracts arose because at the end of the day, humans are more interested in personal liberty and life and wish to avoid conflict as much as possible. More pessimistic people like Hobbes thought it was because humans are so naturally warlike that we needed social contracts to prevent our own violent natures.
6 0
3 years ago
Explain how industrialization
SpyIntel [72]

Answer:

As in England, and some Western European Countries that began to industrialize earlier than the U.S. (Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, and France), industrialization brought massive changes to American workers.

For one, decade after decade more people moved to the cities, and less people stayed in the countryside as farmers. A big difference is that farmers in the U.S. frequently owned the land while industrial workers did not own the factories.

This means that workers make a living by earning a wage for their work in the factory, while farmers usually make a living either by consuming the food they produce, or by selling the food, or a combination of both. This gives a greater autonomy and power to the farmer, but not necessarily a higher income.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Economic Warfare is
    5·1 answer
  • Why is cassius reluctant to allow antony to speak at caesar's funeral?
    7·1 answer
  • Which event occurred shortly after the
    7·2 answers
  • Did cotton grow in all of the Southern States
    5·1 answer
  • Before World War I, religious beliefs did NOT _____ science. A. support B. Contradict C.Encourage D. Advance
    14·2 answers
  • A type of theology that argues that the teachings of Jesus can and should inspire not only charity but sociopolitical change to
    10·1 answer
  • The United States and its allies supported:
    14·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the siege of the Alamo?
    6·1 answer
  • Who was the founder of the Mormon religion, the church of Jesus Christ of latter day saints?
    5·2 answers
  • Kentucky, missouri, maryland, and delaware were known as what kind of states? border border slave slave union union confederate
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!