1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vlada-n [284]
2 years ago
5

Shakespeare’s historical plays dramatize the lives of English rulers during the Medieval era. Why are these plays not always his

torically accurate?
English
1 answer:
nignag [31]2 years ago
8 0
Because shakespeare changed the facts to make a political or social statement
You might be interested in
Blood is ALWAYS red.<br> O True<br> False
vlabodo [156]

Answer:

It's true

Explanation: You can search online is blood red, or if you ever got injured you will see that if you are bleeding the blood is red

8 0
2 years ago
Isabella has 5 pounds of trail mix. she divides the mix into 1/4 pound serving, how many 1/4 pound serving does she have?
frosja888 [35]

Answer:

It would be 3 pounds

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I will give you branilest!
Free_Kalibri [48]

Answer:

Explanation:

How far into the story have you gotten i had to read it like 2 years ago, you mean the book about johnny boy right? the outsiders?

5 0
2 years ago
You should write your entire message in the subject? True or false
egoroff_w [7]

Answer:

no

Explanation:

make sure to add info

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read the following excerpt from Nixon's "Checker's" speech: Which logical fallacy or fallacies would you say he used and why? Ex
Gre4nikov [31]

Answer:

Explanation:

What is he actually saying? Is he saying that he took 18000 dollars and that is not only legally or morally wrong? Is he saying that he took 18000 dollars and that it was secretly given and secretly handled and that in return, he granted special favors to the people who gave him the money? Is he actually admitted doing that?

From this part of the speech, we don't know. Nixon was so slimy that you need the rest of the speech to know what he did and what he's admitting to. But what he is saying is that if he could buy a new GM product with the money and not declare what he had done, then he was wrong both morally and legally.

So what's wrong? The problem is if his next statement is that it was for expenses occurred and he can flap a receipt in the face of his accusers, he has shown them to be rats and much worse than he is.

And if he actually did take the 18000 for personal reasons, then he is on his way to getting the sympathy he needs to beat the charge. And the Democrats loose even if they are right. He shows himself to be a decent honorable man no matter which answer is true.

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the overall tone created by the speaker?
    14·1 answer
  • The wind howled in the trees &amp; rattled the windows panes. As Jamaal lay in his bed, he could hear the pounding of the hail a
    8·1 answer
  • Why is education and knowledge important? ​
    14·2 answers
  • Which fictional character would be the most boring to meet in real life?
    7·2 answers
  • Select the correct answer.
    13·1 answer
  • What is one way that wolf packs keep the peace and work together
    12·1 answer
  • Topics for speaking and listening exam?????????????
    8·1 answer
  • The restatement of the thesis in the conclusion should use the exact same words as
    8·2 answers
  • O captain my captain answers?
    5·2 answers
  • House is to _ as bus is to mobile
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!