When your text states that communication is unavoidable, it means that people will probably associate meaning to your actions, even when you don not intend to speak of something.
1) C
A - them is unnecessary in this and you would need to add “his” in order for this to work
B- His is unnecessary, “both sisters are taller” is more proper sounding
D - “the two both his sisters are taller”, the two is unnecessary, and the is unnecessary, to make this work it would be “both his sisters are taller”
2) Im pretty sure it’s B but I’m not 100% sure
As for advantages, the article shows that handwriting can promote psychological improvements, optimize the ability to concentrate, and improve writing and reading skills. As for disadvantages, she claims that handwriting is slow, obsolete, and used less and less nowadays. The author concludes that mastery of calligraphy is not important and can be abandoned without major consequences.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- The author states that handwriting is something that has become obsolete over time.
- This is because, smartphones and computers are increasingly modern, the need for the use of handwriting has decreased.
- Although handwriting has b, the author says that abandoning it will not cause disastrous changes, but will promote the optimization of technological resources.
Although the abandonment of handwriting has advantages and disadvantages, we can confirm that its use has become increasingly rare. Furthermore, current technology allows us to encourage the advantages of not mastering handwriting and combat the disadvantages.
You can learn more about technological advancements at the link:
brainly.com/question/17893201
I would go with A! I think that’s the best answer!
Often times people say that William Shakespeare was and still is a legend. They <span>are correct. It is amazing how Shakespeare's play Romeo and Juliet written </span><span>centuries ago can be better than Franco Zefferelli's movie production of Romeo </span><span>and Juliet, which had much better technology to work with only decades ago. </span><span>Although the movie appeared better, it left out some major parts. The play had </span><span>better mood and plot details which made it much more dramatic and by far a </span><span>better presentation. </span><span>One major difference between the play and the movie occurs in mood. An example </span><span>of this is the marriage scene. In the marriage scene of the play, Romeo and </span><span>Juliet act very serious. The reader can tell this by the way the two speak. </span><span>Romeo says that the Holy Words the Friar speaks can make something without an </span><span>equal (Act II, Scene 6, Line 4) which is a very intelligent thing to say. </span><span>Whereas, in the movie they kiss and giggle the entire time. This leads the </span><span>viewer to believe that Franco Zefferelli wanted the two to look like fools, that </span><span>they could not do anything the way it is normally done because they are children </span><span>in search of quick love. This is bad because it is not very realistic. In </span><span>real-life, young adults would take the matter seriously because they know it is </span><span>a major step in life. Because the play is not entirely trying to make the two </span><span>look bad, it is the better production. </span><span>Another major difference in the mood of the play and the movie is in the funeral </span><span>scene. The funeral scene of the play is a very serious event. Juliet's family </span><span>is very upset and think that they are the cause of her "death". Also, the Friar </span><span>soothes the family of the loss of young Juliet's life (Act IV, Scene 5, Line 65). </span><span> However, in the movie version of the funeral scene, again everyone is sad but </span><span>this time the Friar lets out a giggle as he pretends to pray for Juliet. This </span><span>is a major difference because if someone had seen the Friar giggle, it may have </span><span>changed the entire play. They may have questioned him why he giggled but since </span><span>he would not have a reason he may just spill what he knows. Since the movie was </span><span>once again unrealistic, the play is the better production in this scene as well. </span><span>Some other major differences between the play and the movie occurred in the plot </span><span>details. One example of this is in the beginning of the story. In the play, </span><span>Romeo is just getting over Rosaline "rejecting" him (Act I, Scene 1, Line 155). </span><span>This means that he could have just been very upset. Resulting in him just </span><span>grabbing the first thing he could find which just happened to be Juliet. If he </span><span>had never even met Rosaline he probably would have never met Juliet either. </span><span>Although in the movie version of this part, all that the viewer knows is that </span><span>Romeo is extremely upset from something that was never brought up. If Franco </span><span>Zefferelli had added this to his production it would probably make more sense </span><span>that him just leaving it out and having the viewer guess what was the matter </span><span>with Romeo. Due to this difference, the play once again is better because the </span><span>plot is more thought out then the movie where the viewer has to guess. </span><span>Another difference between the play and the movie in plot details is at the </span><span>ending of the entire story. In the play, the families are finally at peace as </span><span>Romeo and Juliet's real funerals take place . The Montague's even decide to </span><span>erect a gold statue of Juliet and the Capulet's shake hand's with them which are </span><span>very good signs that the long and bitter feud of the two families is over (Act V, </span><span>Scene 3, Line 295). On the other hand, the movie only shows that he two </span><span>families have come together. But this is for a reason that virtually and two </span><span>groups would come together for-a funeral of one for one of their family members. </span><span>All that the families do to acknowledge each other is as they walk into the </span><span>church, they turn to face their equal in the opposite family. This is probably </span><span>the biggest difference out of the productions because one of the goal's that </span><span>Romeo, Juliet and Friar Laurence had was that this marriage would end the </span><span>quarrels. The play's version of this was better because nobody really wants to </span><span>see a sad story which Romeo and Juliet is until the end but the play makes it a </span><span>happy story (in a way) by one of Romeo and Juliet's primary goals being </span><span>completed, although they had to die for it. </span><span>Due to all of the examples listed here, the mood in the marriage scene, the mood </span><span>in the funeral scene, and the plot details in the beginning and the end of the </span><span>play, the play is without a doubt, the better production. However, if Franco </span><span>Zefferelli had made his movie more as a work of art instead of a production, and </span><span>spent a little more time in doing so, he could have had himself one of the best </span>movies ever, which William Shakespeare did with his play Partner sites: Spanish Language Schools, Pit Bull, and Free Essays and Term Papers
