<span>bali is killed by golden arrow shot by rama</span>
Answer:
Both passages use evidence to develop the claim that the general public needed to know about the terrors of involuntary servitude.
Explanation: It is difficult to say for sure because everything is run together. It is difficult to see where the first article ends and the second one begins.
The following sentence, however, could support the choice: Both passages use evidence to develop the claim that the general public needed to know about the terrors of involuntary servitude.
"it also gave the antislavery forces an opportunity. If they could reverse the flow—make the horrors of slavery visible to those who benefited from it—they might be able to end the vile practice forever."
Together with the part about Equanio's memoir, there is support for this choice.
Sorry, i can't be more helpful.
Another possibility:
Both passages use evidence to show that knowledge of the extreme brutality of the sugar trade changed viewpoints about enslavement. Support: It seems that the early section "In the Age of Sugar, when slavery was more brutal than ever." and "Clarkson brandished whips and handcuffs used on slaves; he published testimonials from sailors and ship doctors who described the atrocities and punishments on slave ships." from the end support this possibility-- but THIS passage does not say that viewpoints have changed.
Answer:
The correct answer is <u>A</u>: Andrew Carnegie married Louise Whitfield in 1887 and had a daughter named Margaret. He passed away on August 11, 1919, due to a bout of pneumonia.
Explanation:
The sentence from the passage describes Carnegie as a big philanthropist who was wealthy and tends to help other people who didn't have enough money.
Option A is the only one that cannot be considered as a supporting detail for the sentence because it reveals some stuff about his family and the date and the reason for his death.
The rest of the options refers to Carnegie's devotion to philanthropy and those sentences can be considered as a supporting details for the excerpt above.
Answer:
The correct answer is YES
Explanation:
This is a complete sentence because it has,
-proper grammar
-good puncuation
-comma is in the right place
