"They were taxed without having representation in Parliament" and this was the reason taxes were an ongoing source of conflict for the American colonists. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the third option or the penultimate option.<span>
</span>
Arson statutes typically classify arson as a felony due to the potential to cause injuries or death.
Targeted killing is defined as a form of assassination carried out by governments.
Hope this helps you! Good luck
Answer:
Pride;Fear
Explanation:
PRIDE can be defined as the way a person is been fulfilled as a result of his/her achievement and it can also lead to a fulfilled feeling of belonging and a product of praise especially towards one's own actions .
Pride also can mean satisfaction from doing something good or great it is often seen as a sense of the respect that people have for someone.
FEAR can be defined as the way in which a person smell or perceived danger around them which inturn create intense fear or triggers fear in such person and this can often lead to physiological and behavioral changes of the person because of the unpleasant emotion or thought that the person have when he or she is frightened by something.
Therefore Four-year-old Junko who lives in Miyazaki, Japan based on the text's discussion means Junko's parents are probably most concerned with regulating her expression of PRIDE while Jacie who is also 4, but she lives in Meridian, Mississippi. Based on the text's discussion, means Jacie's parents are probably most concerned with controlling her expression of FEAR
The real reason for maintaining armies is the same reason why some men buy expensive sports cars... overcompensating.
Seriously, think of armies as insurance. Even if it's small, amateurish, and under-funded, it's likely to give potential bullies a little pause. (Of course, a big country like Iraq can sweep up a little country like Kuwait in no time flat, as we all know).
Part of the answer is social/ economic/ political inertia. The military is part of the playground for the elite and privileged. (I use the word playground as in "fork over your lunch money, weakling.") Who wants to get rid of their army just to balance the budget? I sure haven´t seen "fire soldier-boys" on any IMF or World Bank wish lists
A lot of countries, fragile democracies, say, find armies to be an effective tool to use on internal "problems." In a pinch, a loyal military can keep your nation away from chaos. On the other hand, they work equally well to keep dictators in power.
<span>Many countries do get a lot more mileage out of their armies than Iceland or Costa Rica could possibly get. Obviously, a lot of African countries find them pretty handy.
</span>
Also, keep this quote in mind
<span>"It takes two countries to maintain peace and only one to make war"</span>
