Question:
For an economy starting at potential output, a decrease in autonomous expenditure in the short-run results in a(n):
A. increase in potential output
B. recessionary output gap
C. decrease in potential output
D. expansionary output gap
Answer:
The correct answer is B
Explanation:
A decrease in autonomous expenditure shifts the Planned Aggregate Expenditure curve downward thus creating a lower equilibrium output.
PAE = C + Ip + G + NX
where
PAE = Planned Aggregate Expenditure
C = consumption
Ip = Investment Spending
G = Government Spending
NX = Net Export
If an economy has its output equal to its potential, this will create a reduction in short-run equilibrium output leading to a recessionary output gap.
Cheers!
Answer:
Write convert() method to cast double to int Complete the convert() method that casts the parameter from a double to an integer and returns the result. Note that the main() method prints out the returned value of the convert() method.
Ex: If the double value is 19.9, then the output is: 19
Ex: If the double value is 3.1, then the output is: 3.
Explanation:
<h2>plz bhai mera answer ko brainliest kar do..</h2>
Answer:
$3,483.17
Explanation:
Calculation for the amount of cost allocated to the Cafeteria under the step method
Using this formula
Allocation to Cafeteria=[Cafeteria/(Cafeteria+Producing Department A+Producing Department B)]×Budgeted costs
Let plug in the formula
Allocation to Cafeteria=[25/(25 + 308 + 287)] x $72,450
Allocation to Cafeteria=(25/520)×$72,450
Allocation to Cafeteria=0.0480769231×$72,450
Allocation to Cafeteria=$3,483.17
Therefore the amount of cost allocated to the Cafeteria under the step method would be $3,483.17
Answer:
The Correct answer is $85 U.
Explanation:
Spending change is the contrast among the real and expected (planned) measure of a cost
Genuine Spending on cleaning equipment and supplies in April = $3,450
Planned Spending in cleaning equipment and supplies in April = $2600 + $51 × 15 boat = $ 3365
Difference among Budgeted and Actual is $ 85 for example abundance spending than planned subsequently this difference is Unfavorable for organization.
Answer:
Job 301 $ 11,000
Job 302 $ 16,500
Job 303 $ 22,000
Explanation:
To calculate the overhead rate <u>we divide the estimated overhead cost by the estimated cost driver:</u>
0.55 overhead rate
Job 301 $20,000 labor cost x 0.55 overhead rate
11,000
Job 302 $30,000 labor cost x 0.55 overhead rate
16,500
Job 303 $40,000 labor cost x 0.55 overhead rate
22,000
