The skepticism about the empire of Ghana and the accounts for it is nothing weird because the majority of what is written about it is from two people from the same place, that had totally different views and interpretations on the things, and came from different culture.
Very often in the historical text, the people that wrote something have been very subjective, not objective. Thus the writings of these two Arab geographers can be very misleading, as they described what they saw with their own eyes, but also with using their own perception. That has proven numerous times to give very inaccurate depictions of a society and culture, like the depictions of the Romans for the Celts, or of the Greeks for the Scythian female warriors that they named Amazons.
There's only one point of view unfortunately, and it is always much more reliable when multiple writings are available from people from multiple different backgrounds, or the best scenario if it is writings from the people in question.
Herbert Hoover and Al Smith ran in the election of 1928. Hoover and Smith represented different backgrounds, religious ideas; each appealed to different groups of Americans.
Source -- Quizlet
Answer:
Science has demonstrated that the same bacterium, Yersinia yersi, caused both outbreaks, bolstering arguments that, like the Black Death, the Justinianic Plague also caused significant historical events during the period, such as the fall of the Roman Empire and the rise of Islam.
Explanation:
