<h3>
Answer: reflection over x axis</h3>
g(x) = -f(x) is the same as g(x) = -1*f(x)
Since y = f(x), we are really saying g(x) = -1*y. Whatever the y coordinate is on f(x), multiply it by -1. This turns something like y = 2 into y = -2, or something like y = -3 into y = 3, etc etc. Visually this reflects the point over the horizontal x axis. Do this to all points on f(x), and the entire curve reflects over the x axis.
I show an example of y = x^2 turn into y = -x^2 in the attached image below.
Let d be the number of days and h be the height
h = 13 + 0.6d
Answer: (a) h = 13 + 0.6d
Given height = 0.208m, find d:
0.208m = 20.8 cm
20.8 = 13 + 0.6d
0.6d = 20.8 - 13 = 7.8
d = 7.8 ÷ 0.6 = 13
Answer: (b) 13 days
<h3>
Answer: 1/2</h3>
The midsegment is always exactly half as long compared to the side it's parallel to.
Put another way, the longer side (4x+20) is twice long as the midsegment (3x).
Answer:
the answer is -6,5
Step-by-step explanation:
just look at the left side ( the x axis )first then right(the y axis)
Answer:
Part A: YES, it is.
Part B: the amount of pumpkin picked and the amount of fertilizer applied.
Step-by-step explanation:
Part A:
The closer the correlation coefficient is to 1, the stronger the relationship between two variables, and vice versa. Also, the closer the data points are on a scatter plot, the closer the correlation coefficient is to 1.
The scatter plot shown indicates a positive correlation between number of days and number of pumpkins. However, the data points are to some extent farther apart from each other. This shows a moderate relationship between the two variables. Therefore, a correlation coefficient, r, of 0.51 that was calculated can be concluded to be accurate , because an r of 0.51 depicts a moderate relationship between two variables.
Part B:
A variable that could affect the number of pumpkins picked could be amount of fertilizer applied, instead of the day in October. Thus, we can compare the amount of pumpkin picked and the amount of fertilizer applied.
