1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
True [87]
4 years ago
14

Colonists were angered by the stamp act of 1765 because they

History
2 answers:
svetlana [45]4 years ago
8 0
"They did not have representation of Parliament"- History Guy
larisa [96]4 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Because They thought it wrong that they had to pay the taxes that this law required.

Explanation:

With the Seal Act, England ordered that all official documents, newspapers, books, certificates circulating in the Colony be sealed. This sealing implied the payment of taxes to the metropolis

In disgust, the colonists did not accept the impositions of the English Crown. In this climate of discontent and revolt among the settlers, libertarian ideals influenced by the Enlightenment thinkers arose. Aware of their strength, they refused to pay the fees and turned a blind eye to taxed goods. England was not willing to negotiate and the clash between settlers and the metropolis was inevitable. This was one of the factors that triggered the independence war of the 13 English colonies.

You might be interested in
What was the clash between Arthur Phillip and benne long
matrenka [14]
Bennelong was captured and imprisoned by Arthur Phillip's men.<span />
3 0
3 years ago
Many of the most important minor parties have been which kind of party
Naddik [55]
I think its a splinter party

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I'LL MAKE YOU BRAINLIEST ASAP
Alexxandr [17]

The Romans brought the benefits of Roman civilization and culture to conquered territories,and thus assimilated their populations (at least,those that hadn't been killed or enslaved during the conquest) into the empire as a whole.

The purpose of this was to win conquered peoples over to the Roman way of life - a higher and more advanced standard of living would reconcile them to Roman rule.

Sometimes though there would be serious revolts against Roman rule - one in Britain and 2 in Judea were the most serious,so this policy didn't necessarily work everywhere all of the time.

MARK ME BRAINLIEST PLEASE!!!!!

4 0
3 years ago
How did the czars of the 1800 hinder Russia’s development Nicholas I, Alexander III
miv72 [106K]
Their government was mostly consisting of corrupt bureaucrats and ineffective economic policies that mostly helped the rich stay rich and the poor stay poor. In between them was a king who tried to implement some more liberal policies for the people, but Alexander III mostly reversed them all because he didn't want his autocracy to be challenged.<span />
5 0
4 years ago
Conquistador were attracted to the Americans by
ipn [44]

Answer:

stories of riches and Spanish religious zeal

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In the constitution of every state, final authority rests with ________.
    12·1 answer
  • BRAINLIESTTT ASAP!!!
    5·1 answer
  • How much did al gore win the popular vote by?
    12·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the railroad industry in great Britain during the industrial revolution?
    9·2 answers
  • How did Japan promote capitalism?
    8·1 answer
  • Which group has generally used its power to gerrymander congressional districts
    11·1 answer
  • The two schools of thought that paved the way for the cognitive revolution in psychology in the 1960s were
    11·1 answer
  • What are opposites of federalists? i need 3
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following best explains how the ideas expressed in Source 1 influenced the actions described in Source 2?
    8·1 answer
  • I don't know why we are re-learning this in the 8th grade but I don't remember the answer:
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!