1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zhannawk [14.2K]
3 years ago
14

?The rights-based approach would be consistent with recognizing human rights, and the crime control approach would be consistent

with:
Social Studies
2 answers:
Mrac [35]3 years ago
3 0
The rights-based approach would be consistent with recognizing human rights, and the crime control approach would be consistent with: <span>promoting and protecting human </span>rights<span>.

Which means that within this approach, the law enforcement is not permitted under any circumtances to impose unecessary violence upon the citizen no matter how guilty the law enforcmet think they are.</span>
lutik1710 [3]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

  • noble cause corruption
  • expansion of governmental powers
  • reduction of civil liberties

Explanation:

Crime is an act that is prohibited by law and has a certain penalty if it is performed. It is an action taken by a person who goes against the law and receives a punishment. Crime can also be conceptualized as an attitude that can be committed by a person or a group that violates criminal law and has punitive consequences (punishment).

Crime brings various harms to society, so governments have stipulated approaches to contain and even prevent crime from occurring. Among these approaches, those that are most expressive and deserve to be cited are:

  • noble cause corruption
  • expansion of governmental powers
  • reduction of civil liberties

You might be interested in
By giving members of the House of Representatives two-year terms, the framers of the constitution were intending ________.
Basile [38]

Answer:

elected members of the House adhere to the requests of their constituents more closely than the members of the Senate have.

Explanation:

According to my research on Senate term time-frames, I can say that based on the information provided within the question he framers of the constitution were most likely intending that elected members of the House adhere to the requests of their constituents more closely than the members of the Senate have.

I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.

7 0
3 years ago
Participants in an experiment by Toi and Batson listened to a tape recording in which a student (Carol) in their Introductory Ps
PIT_PIT [208]

Answer:

a. empathized with Carol, most participants helped whether she was in their section.

Explanation:

Baton recognised that sometimes people helped others out of their own self interests. In this experiment, there were two groups, the high empathy group and the low empathy group.

Those in the high empathy group were found to be equally likely to help Carol in any circumstance, while those in the low empathy group only helped her out of their own self interests. As seeing Carol In school everyday made them have a sense of guilt if they refused to help.

5 0
2 years ago
Why did Christianity appeal to many Romans? Give a detailed response
maksim [4K]

There are at least three reasons why historians might conclude that Christianity appealed more to many Romans than the old Roman religion did.  We must remember that these are ideas that historians propose and not necessarily those that religious people would accept.  Actual Romans might have said they preferred Christianity because God spoke to their hearts and told them it was true.  Historians have to be more cynical and look for worldly causes for religious belief.

One reason that Romans might have liked Christianity is because its god cared about people.  Roman religion was based on transactions.  If people performed certain actions, the gods would perform other actions in return.  It was like buying something on Amazon.  By contrast, in Christianity, God loves all people regardless of what they do or believe.  God hopes that people will do the right thing and will punish them if they do wrong, but he loves them as individuals even when they do bad things.  Historians say that Romans might have liked this idea because it fed their emotional need to feel that they were valuable and worth caring about.

A second factor in Christianity’s popularity might have been its moral code.  Roman religion really did not say much if anything about how people should act in their daily lives.  The gods did not care how people acted towards one another.  The Christian god, on the other hand, handed down a strict set of rules about how people were to behave.  This might have made people like Christianity because it made them feel that they had instructions about how to live their lives.

Finally, historians emphasize Christianity’s inclusive nature.  The Roman world was very unequal.  There were a few elites, a group of people who were well-off, and many, many poor people and slaves.  The Roman religion did not give any of the people of the lower classes a sense that they were valuable.  This is where Christianity was so different.  It taught that all people are equal in the eyes of God.  Historians believe that this would have made many people like the idea of Christianity because it gave them hope that god cared about them regardless of their status and that they, the “meek” would one day inherit the earth.

Historians suggest all of these as reasons why people in Roman times might have been attracted to Christianity.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why are police not allowed to search you and take you stuff without a good reason
alisha [4.7K]
Police can only search you or your 'stuff', if they have reasonable doubts that you are carrying something criminal. Criminal items can include drugs, weapons, evidence of a crime, etc. 
Thank you! :D
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A person who is experiencing cognitive dissonance might justify the dissonance if he has ________ control over his actions.
kykrilka [37]

Answer: d) Little or no

Explanation:

Cognitive dissonance is defined as the tendency of an individual in which thoughts,emotions,feelings,attitude ,actions occur in unstable manner due to change in behavioral pattern, imbalanced attitude etc.The person does not persist control over these factors .

Other options are incorrect ,because in the condition of cognitive dissonance , a person does not has complete,some or near to complete control over the actions that he/she performs due to inconsistent change in behavior. Thus, the correct option is option(d).

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the process by which a nation or country is ruled?
    15·1 answer
  • Quais são alguns problemas de saúde que podem ser causados ​​por uma dieta pobre?​
    10·1 answer
  • Along with papyrus the egyptians also invented ______
    13·2 answers
  • The 115 kids in the fourth grade are going on a field trip. If each bus can hold 46 passengers how many buses will they need?​
    14·2 answers
  • Ways in which entrepreneurship can help combat unemployment and improve the economy of south Africa?
    7·1 answer
  • How did the war affect women and African Americans
    15·1 answer
  • 10.Brokers look at indexes like the Dow
    14·1 answer
  • Join my among us game please (my name is puncakes): QXGDUF
    13·2 answers
  • How does development of society bring change in the society? write in a sentence.​
    11·1 answer
  • Suggest two ways in which dairy farming can be lmproved
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!