As you know, Germany was an absolute mess after World War I. Citizens were starving, and thousands of Germans had lost their job. Adolf Hitler saw this as an opportunity to manipulate Germans into thinking it was the Jews who had caused all their troubles. People were desperate and hopeless. They need someone to tell them what to do, and how to fix this mess. They needed someone to tell them who to blame for their starvation and their losses. Adolf Hitler, unfortunately, rose up and became that person.
"First, I want you to starve.
Then I want you to lose your job.
Now you're looking for someone to blame?
That's when I step in and start to dictate."
Leavenworth provided the earliest visual record of Oklahoma.
Answer: “Birth of a Nation”—D. W. Griffith’s disgustingly racist yet titanically original 1915 feature—back to the fore. The movie, set mainly in a South Carolina town before and after the Civil War, depicts slavery in a halcyon light, presents blacks as good for little but subservient labor, and shows them, during Reconstruction, to have been goaded by the Radical Republicans into asserting an abusive dominion over Southern whites. It depicts freedmen as interested, above all, in intermarriage, indulging in legally sanctioned excess and vengeful violence mainly to coerce white women into sexual relations. It shows Southern whites forming the Ku Klux Klan to defend themselves against such abominations and to spur the “Aryan” cause overall. The movie asserts that the white-sheet-clad death squad served justice summarily and that, by denying blacks the right to vote and keeping them generally apart and subordinate, it restored order and civilization to the South.
“Birth of a Nation,” which runs more than three hours, was sold as a sensation and became one; it was shown at gala screenings, with expensive tickets. It was also the subject of protest by civil-rights organizations and critiques by clergymen and editorialists, and for good reason: “Birth of a Nation” proved horrifically effective at sparking violence against blacks in many cities. Given these circumstances, it’s hard to understand why Griffith’s film merits anything but a place in the dustbin of history, as an abomination worthy solely of autopsy in the study of social and aesthetic pathology.
Answer:
Your answer is D
Explanation: Because the treaty happening then the WWII and then the united nations :)
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Because he had a close personal relationship with leaders of the French Revolution and his involvement in it
