1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
disa [49]
2 years ago
8

Douglass declares to his audience that “This Fourth [of] July is yours, not mine.” What does he mean in this statement?

History
1 answer:
lesya692 [45]2 years ago
4 0
Douglas means that the 4th of July is a celebration of freedom, but how could African Americans celebrate a day of freedom if they were still enslaved? The audience spoken to was primarily white, so in turn, the white population of America may celebrate their freedom on the 4th but for all the enslaved blacks it was not a day to rejoice because they had not yet gained their freedom
You might be interested in
Which European power was the last to control the are of Oklahoma? Britain Spain France Portugal
ankoles [38]
The answer is Britain.
4 0
3 years ago
What Would The Consequences Have Been If He Had Chosen To Drop The Bomb ?
Ira Lisetskai [31]

Answer:

There would be an all out nucelar war...

Explanation:

plz give more context

7 0
2 years ago
Greek alphabet impact on Russia?
Softa [21]

The Cyrillic alphabet is closely based on the Greek alphabet, with about a dozen additional letters invented to represent Slavic sounds not found in Greek. In Russia, Cyrillic was first written in the early Middle Ages in clear-cut, legible ustav (large letters).

4 0
3 years ago
Which event directly led to the end of the Vietnam War?
allsm [11]

Answer: D) The US Christmas bombing campaign

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What actions were taken as "clear indicators" of U.S. post war position? (Nokilov Telegram)
IRINA_888 [86]

Answer:

<em>Hello There Again. The correct answer C. Limiting Soviet influence in neighboring countries.</em>

Explanation:

Because of The Russian  Russia had ever

known before. This achievement and its ensuing results led to the emergence

of the Soviet Union as a military superpower. In this capacity, the Soviet

Union was able to project its power to a degree unparalleled in Russian

history-a transformation with immense potential. This broad view focused

the examination of the symposium’s various topics and themes, orally in

presentations and discussions, and then more fully in the essays of this

volume, composed prior to the symposium and refiied in its wake.

All historical records are incomplete and these proceedings are an

imperfect record. The introductions and commentaries exhibit some discontinuities because their authors did not see the revised versions of the papers

contained in this volume. The members of the inti~~ti~nal panelwhich

closed the symposium commented only briefly because of time limitations,

but subsequently submitted the written observations in this volume. Discussions with the audience at the symposium’s sessions and the banquet presentation by Brig. Gen. Roland Lajoie, USA, on “The Soviet Fignting Man” are

not included here because of space limitations. They must remain the special

pleasure, benefit, and memory of the symposium’s participants.

What distinguishes this book from others in Soviet studies and Russian

military history? In Soviet studies a plethora of books and articles on military issues exists in a contemporary framework from the vantage points of

national security and international relations. Very few are written in the historical perspective. In Western writing on Russian military history, the

number of historians and uniformed specialists recognized as truly outstanding is surprisingly limited- fact which became forcefully evident to

the symposium’s organizers as they combed Germany, France, Great Britain,

and the United Stam for qualified contributors. This volume views the subject historically and may be unique in its combination of overall program,

individual connibutions, and suggestions for future research. In the structure

of its program it is a survey of modern Russian military history. In its individual contributions it provides a good bit of specialized “post-holing.” It

possesses a pragmatic, professional military view in having sought out contributions by qualified military contributors and in providing a bibliographical aid. This aid is a significant indicator of the current professional

level of Soviet military studies in the West, offering military specialists,

scholars, and graduate students a readily accessible tool for further research

and study. The Great Patriotic War demonstrated both capabilities and deficiencies

in Soviet society, many still unexplored by Western specialists. The ability

of the Soviet Union to sustain itself in the face of extraordmxy losses and

destruction is indisputable. Why this was true is less cIear. It may be that

this was the major contribution of the Communist Party, but the issue remains

unestablished, at least in Western minds. This question is related to one of

the symposium’s major gaps, the question of the role of the “rear” or the

“homefront” in Russian wars and in particular in World War II. The poverty

of Westem scholarship on the Russian and Soviet ‘‘mar’’ caused planners for

the Academy’s 1982 military history symposium to leave out Russia and the

Soviet Union altogether at that symposium, which was devoted to the subject. Hope it helps!

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 17.   What allowed Native Americans in Mexico to settle cities larger than those in areas to the north?        A. The requiremen
    13·1 answer
  • Why do you think the change in the language<br> made?
    15·1 answer
  • Help pls :) world history, chinese dynasties, multiple choice! (will mark brainliest)
    12·1 answer
  • What was the Great Compromise of 1787? What did it do to Congress?
    15·2 answers
  • Witch statement best describes the geographic change to the u.s following the treaty guadalupe-hidalgo?
    8·1 answer
  • 20 POINTS NEED HELP ASAP WILL MARK BRAINLIST
    7·2 answers
  • When Washington announced to the
    14·2 answers
  • Was Ghandi a barrister or solicitor during each the two periods when he practiced law in South Africa?
    15·1 answer
  • Compare and contrast the ideals of socialism and communism.
    8·1 answer
  • Please answer this question carefully.<br><br>Sub: History and Political science (History)​
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!