Answer:
External validity
Explanation:
External validity: In research, the term "external validity" is described as the extent or degree to which a researcher can generalize his or her findings to distinct groups of individuals, measures, and situations.
-External validity of specific research is considered as good or high when it can be applicable to some other people, setting, times, and experiments whereas it is considered as low when it can't be applied to any other situation.
In the question above, the given statement represent external validity.
7 times the 24 rows would be 168
168 minus the 9 being taken away would be your answer: 159
Is that it’s always changing
<u>Answer:
</u>
As there are no published listings of risk groups for human pathogens anywhere in the world, Principal Investigators must start by developing a Risk Group ranking for the pathogen they propose using in research is a FALSE statement.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- As the risk posed by the pathogens cannot be determined without an exclusive logical experiment performed to determine the exact damage, the risk group ranking of the pathogen is not clearly possible.
- The Principal Investigators would be rather advised to take up the research regarding the risk factor of the pathogen of their concern alone in order to avoid the wastage of time and resources.
Routine replies and positive messages should close with the <span>information that highlights and shows a benefit to the audience.
</span>Your message will probably succeed in the event that it leaves your readers with the inclination that you have their best advantages as a main priority and you can achieve this by featuring an advantage to the audience or by communicating gratefulness or generosity.
