Answer:
Diversity: When many different ideas/opinions/races/religions etc. are present.
Equality: The right of different groups of people to have the same rights and be treated the same.
Inclusion: The act of including something as a part of skmething else. Also the idea that everyone should be able to use the same facilities and enjoy the same experiences, no matter race/religion/disability or other minority.
Discrimination: Purposefully treating a group of people differently (and worse) because of their race/sexual identity/sexuality/religion etc.
The correct answer is letter C.
Christianity had a great ideal of influence and the Bible stories about freedom often kept enslaved workers' hopes alive. This was the time where people met in secret to talk about their sufferings, pray, sing, and dance to thank the God for all the blessings that the slaves are about to achieve.
Answer:
<em>I can see that there are no choices.</em>
fallacy of bandwagon
Explanation:
A "logical fallacy" refers to the error of reasoning or logical gap that makes an argument invalid.
The situation above commits the fallacy of the bandwagon because the argument is being supported only according to a significant number of population. This is a fallacy because it doesn't necessarily mean all of the retired persons are unhappy about the level of Social Security assistance due to the opinion of 30 persons who agreed that they were unhappy. It becomes a "standalone justification" of the validity of an argument. We cannot judge the happiness or unhappiness of all retired persons according only to a group of 30 persons <em>(even though they were chosen from different parts of the country). </em>
So, this explains the answer.
Appellate jurisdiction means that the Court has the authority to review the decisions of lower courts. The United States district courts are the trial courts of the federal court system. This is where federal cases are tried, where witnesses testify, and federal juries serve. There are 94 federal district courts in the United States. Most of the cases the Supreme Court hears are appeals from lower courts.
I think it's necessary. We live in a society in the process of building a democracy accessible to all people. Like every process, we are subject to failure. The justice system has been questioned by social movements about their decisions, often considered unfair. In this way, the possibility of appealing to a new analysis of the case is important so that some decisions are reviewed.
