During the Age of Exploration, both the Spanish and the French sponsored groups and sailors who would set out on missions to explore new land. The purpose of this was mostly to find gold and other goods.
<span>The people of france were dejected by the reign of terror of Robespierre.This caused a lot of instability in France and also gave birth to the French Revolution. Although Napoleon sabotaged the revolution, but still people were of the opinion that he had the power to bring stability and peace in the country. Napoleon did bring stability and peace for the people of france for a short time. The backlash of the people of France against Robespierre helped Napoleon take over the riegns of power of France by a great deal. He also abolished the law of different rules for different category of people in the country.</span>
Answer:
1,2,3,4
Explanation:
Job loss
falling production
falling demand (occurs twice)
peak production
hopes this helps
Answer: Not if it is a democratically elected government no matter how much the other country does not like it
Explanation:
I am going to assume here you are referring to the 'Scramble of Africa' that happened in the second half of the 19th century, as the European power did not really control the African regions before then.
The methods contexts did differ per colonising power and colonised region, but it boils down to the following factors:
- superior firepower, equipment and recourses; having better guns, armour, communication technology, and supply routes, made the Europeans a formidable enemy that the various tribes simply could not counter.
- co-opting the local elites; a tried and tested method for centuries, this has always been the way smart conquerers could maintain control over a region with minimal fuss and expenditur.
<span>- divide and conquer; conflict between the many tribes of Africa has been a constant for centuries in the continent. The Europeans could easily manipulate the various tribes against each other to prevent a unified resistance from rising up. </span>
<span>- a willingness to use extreme forms of terror; the Europeans might have been all high and mighty back home about their Enlightment and democracy, but in Africa they were more than willing to use forms of terror that would make most contemporary dictators feel a little uneasy. Case in point, the widespread killing and mutilation when quotas were not met in king Leopold II's Congo.</span>