Answer:
a) Personal conflict is encouraged
Explanation:
<em>Note: from the way the question is redacted I am assuming that the question actually is "The personal values of team members on high-performing teams can be enhanced through all of the following beneficial communication practices EXCEPT" so, I'll give my personal answer based on that. </em>
<em />
The term high performing teams refers to teams or groups that are highly focused on their goals and that achieve superior business results. High-performance teams outperform all other similar teams and they outperform expectations given their composition.
Within these kind of teams all important topics are openly discussed since the main goal is to get superior results, as a consequence of this, problems that might present within the team or outside of it are proactively reported. High-performance teams have strong methods of resolving conflict efficiently, so that conflict does not become a roadblock to achieving the team's goals, however, these conflicts have to do with organization problems and not with <u>personal conflicts</u> among the members of the team.
This teams focuses too on mutual trust (trusting in other team members and trusting in the team as an entity) as well as using effective communication methods and channels by putting value in diversity.
<u>Thus, we can see that the only communication practices that do not belong to high-performing teams is: A) personal conflict is encouraged. </u>
<u />
The United States would not interfere in the internal affairs of or the wars between European powers; (2) the United States recognized and would not interfere with existing colonies and dependencies in the Western Hemisphere; (3) the Western Hemisphere was closed to future colonization; and (4) any attempt by a European power to oppress or control any nation in the Western Hemisphere would be viewed as a hostile act against the United States.
The breaking up of something such as federation.
Example:
“His rejection of disunion was consistent with his nationalism”
Hope this helps!
Answer:
The conclusion is false, because it is assuming that correlation = causation.
Explanation:
An important principle in statistical analysis is the principle that when correlation exist between two variables or more, it does not mean that one of the variables are causing the other to appear in a certain manner.
Remember that correlation means that you are investigating whether a relationships exists between two variables; in this example, as we can see, it is between the biodiversity in an ecosystem and the population of an insect.
The graph can be said to illustrate the result of the research; that as the biodiversity of the ecosystem goes down, the insect's population goes up. This is a form of negative correlation.
However - we do not know what is the direction of the relationship; the student concludes that as some insects die within the ecosystem, the researched insect's population goes up; assuming that the predator species died off and thus the researched insect's population increases.
Yet, it is also possible for the relationship to go towards the other direction; the researched insect population increases - perhaps by the introduction of a new food source that causes the species' population to increase - and thus, this damages the biodiversity of the ecosystem, making the population go down since it is possible that the researched insect is instead the species which is on top of the food chain at that ecosystem.
To investigate the direction of a relationship, further research need to be done and more sophisticated statistical methods need to be used.
