Answer:
Option (A) is the correct answer.
Explanation:
A Computer system can be the target for the crime on which a criminal can acquire the information from the computer system which is stored on it. A Criminal is targeting the system with the help of some software that is entered on the computer system through a network.
In the above question, paragraphs are describing the content related to the crime which targets the computer system. This is a concept of a "computer as target". Hence option "A" is the correct answer while the other is not valid because--
- Option b suggests the concept behind the storage device of a computer but in the question, it is about the crime of a computer.
- Option c suggests the concept behind the computer is a criminal but in the question, it is about the crime of a computer.
- Option d suggests the concept behind the communication of a computer but in the question, it is about the crime of a computer.
Answer:
a; circuit-switched network.
b; No, it does not need congestion control.
Explanation:
For A;
A circuit-switched network is a better option for this application. This is because of the fact that the application is made up of long sessions with smooth data transfer capacity needs.
The transmission rate is known, and does not transmit in short intervals(short signals), every application session can have a bandwidth reserved without significant bandwidth wastage.
Also, the overhead expenses of setting up and tearing down connections are canceled out over the extensive period of running an application session.
For B;
If the packet-switched network is used, and traffic in the network comes from the said application. Even if every applications transmit one or more network connections. Still, we already know that every connection has enough transmission capacity to handle majority of the application data rates, no congestion(insignificant queuing) will happen.
This goes to say that no congestion control will be needed given such broad-based connection.
Answer:
SELECT Count(order_invoice) as number_of_invoices, Max(order_invoice) as maximum_invoice, Min(order_invoice) as minimum_invoice, Avg(order_invoice) as average_invoice
FROM vendor JOIN invoice ON invoice.id = vendor.id
WHERE order_invoice > 1
ORDER BY number_of_invoices DESC
Explanation:
The select statement of the SQL or structured query language returns twelve rows of four columns from the inner join of the vendor and invoice table in a database where the order_invoice column in the invoice table is greater than one. The result of the query is ordered by the alias column "number_of_invoices" in descending order.
A device that sucks bc mien broke
