Answer:
C
Explanation:
During the 17th century, the metaphysical poets such as John Donne, Andrew Marvell, John Cleveland, and Abraham Cowley used a literary device known as the metaphysical conceit. A metaphysical conceit is a complex, and often lofty literary device that <u>makes a far-stretched comparison between a spiritual aspect of a person and a physical thing in the world.</u> Quite simply, a metaphysical conceit is an <u>extended metaphor, which can sometimes last through the entire poem.</u> A metaphysical conceit works to connect the reader's sensory perceptions to abstract ideas. Although the conceit slowly went away after the 17th century, due to being perceived as artifice, some later poets like Emily Dickinson used it.
There are many words that can be used to describe Samuel Pepys. The inferences that I can make about the background and personality of Samuel Pepys based on his diary entry about the Great Fire of London was that;
- His words on the diary shows he was a truthful person as there were other documentations by him that the other contemporary documents do not have.
- He was a man who after realizing his faults, stood for a cause of fighting against corruption.
- He helped maintain order. This also shows how peaceful and orderly he is and he works for the common good of the people.
- He is a person who pays attention too details as he gave an accurate description of the Fire and how it occurred.
Samuel Pepys is known to be born on 23 February 1633 and he died on 26 May 1703. He was a famous English diarist and also known to be a naval administrator.
He was known to be an eyewitness of some major historical events such as the Great Plague of 1665 and the Great Fire of London in 1666. He is known to be one Britain's most highly respected, celebrated personality.
Learn more about Samuel Pepys from
brainly.com/question/2626833
Explanation:
SummaryAnalysis
At this point, the book takes on a structure of narration that alternates between the voice of tribal lore, the voice of historical commentary, and the voice of personal memory. It opens with the voice of the tribe, telling the Kiowa creation story, which is that the Kiowas emerged into the world from a hollow log. There were originally more Kiowas, but a pregnant woman got stuck in the log and afterwards no more Kiowas could come into the world, as they were trapped behind her. The voice of history then takes over and explains several early names for the Kiowas, two of which meant “coming out” and one that referred to differing halves, a reference to the hairstyle of Kiowa warriors. This third name, “gaigwu,” is where “Kiowa” likely comes from (“Kiowa” is probably the Comanche pronunciation of “gaigwu”). The voice of personal memory then describes the northern plains, the ancestral land of the Kiowas, emphasizing the way in which all the natural features seem whole and perfect.
An interesting part of the Kiowa creation story is that it is defined by mishap: a pregnant woman got stuck in the hollow log, preventing many Kiowas from entering the world. Reality being shaped by accident rather than deliberate action is a common thread in many Kiowa stories (as in many other myths as well). This resonates with the structure of the book’s narration, which is non-linear and therefore does not place particular importance on the cause and effect of actions over time. In addition, the fact that the word “Kiowa” is actually a Comanche mispronunciation of a Kiowa word is a fitting symbol of the centrality of the influence of other cultures to the Kiowa.
THEMES
Language and Storytelling Theme Icon Origins, Linearity, and Circularity Theme Icon Mixing of Cultures Theme Icon
The relationship between citizen and person is interwoven. Hence, the sentence that captures the relationship would be Option A. Citizen is a kind of person.
Consequently, the relationship is that citizen defines a person. That is, it suggests a person's root. For example,
a. Citizen is a kind of person—someone who belongs to a certain nation.
<h3>Types of Citizenship</h3>
- Citizenship by birth
- Citizenship by family
- Citizenship by marriage
- Citizenship by naturalisation
- Citizenship by investment
Therefore, the relationship is that Citizen is a kind of person—someone who belongs to a certain nation.
learn more about citizen: brainly.com/question/921569
Answer: I think C im not sure
Explanation:
