The answer is "jumping to conclusions".
Jumping to conclusions is a mental term alluding to a correspondence snag where one "judge[s] or decide[s] something without having every one of the actualities; to achieve unjustifiable conclusions". As it were, "the point at which I neglect to recognize what I watched direct from what I have just gathered or assumed". Because it includes settling on choices without having enough data to make sure they are correct, this can offer ascent to terrible or impulsive choices.
Answer:
The correct answer is E The reasonableness of covenants not to compete is examined on a uniform basis.
Explanation:
The reasonableness of covenants not to compete is examined on a uniform basis is an INCORRECT statement regarding covenants not to compete
Answer:
Institutional Corrections
Explanation:
According to my research, Jack's sentence is for Institutional Corrections. Institutional Corrections is the incarceration of adults or juveniles that are convicted of a crime, as well as the detainment of someone that is waiting trial. This is what happened to Jack after being arrested for driving under the influence.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
The Enlightenment was an<span> eighteenth-century European philosophical movement that emphasized the preeminence of reason rather than faith.</span>
I believer that it is A. However Muslims believe that (like in the Christian bibile) there were many prophets before Mohammed however he was the chosen on and wrote down his spiritual hearings and lead the charge after breaking away for Christianity. Don't forget, both religions share similar (sometimes near identical) creation stores and other tales and both . Don't forget Mohammad is in the christian bible and Jesus is in the Koran, both versions of Jesus are near identical until it comes to the Cross and Res-erection.