1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Blababa [14]
3 years ago
14

Who was Jonathan Andrews in the crucible

History
2 answers:
marshall27 [118]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:I don’t think he was in crucible

Explanation:

lyudmila [28]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

There was no John Andrews in The Crucible

Explanation:

There was John Proctor and Rev. John Hale.

I hope I answered your question. Hope you have a great day/night!

You might be interested in
What are some of the attributes of President Reagan’s public speaking abilities that led him to be called "The Great Communicato
drek231 [11]

Answer:

He was clear and President Reagan was kind of crafty with his words ig.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What are three individual rights in both the US and the Texas constitutions?
cestrela7 [59]
Two Constitutions: A Comparison

ADA Text Version

US Constitution featuring the words We the PeopleIn many ways, the U.S. and Texas Constitutions are similar documents. They both embody the principles of representative democratic government, in which sovereignty emanates from the people. Both contain a bill of rights that protects civil liberties from government infringement… both provide for a bicameral legislature with a House of Representatives and a Senate… both seek a system of checks and balances and separation of powers between legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government… and both divide government power between upper and lower levels of government. In the U.S. Constitution the states are subordinate to the federal government, and in the Texas Constitution the counties are subordinate to the state government. But beyond these general features, the two constitutions could not be more different. These differences result from the fact that the two documents arose out of very different historical circumstances and for radically opposite complaints with the document each was meant to replace. With the U.S. Constitution, the problem with the earlier Articles of Confederation was that government was too decentralized and not powerful enough. The U.S. Constitution was designed to overcome these weaknesses and offer a degree of centralization and increased government power. But this is precisely what the Texas Constitution was designed to reverse and avoid. The framers of the U.S. Constitution wanted to enable government action; the framers of the Texas Constitution wanted to paralyze government action.

3 0
3 years ago
Which of these is an example of the long-term impact of the Byzantine Empire on eastern Europe? A) the spread of Eastern Orthodo
muminat

Example of the long term impact is: A) the spread of Eastern Orthodoxy into Russia

After Byzantine empire Conquered a certain region, they required the people in that region to follow their religious teachings. In the past, Current Russian land was part of Byzantine's influenced region.

Because of this, Eastern Orthodox teaching (which adopt the values and rules introduced by the bynzantine empire)  still really popular in Russia even to this day. Approximately, around half of the total eastern orthodox lives in that country, while the rest are spread nicely among the neighboring countries.

Compared to the more modern christian groups, Eastern Orthodox is considered to be more traditionalist/conservative. They require the members to follow a stricter rules than other christian groups.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
As a result of hitlers rise to power, Germany experienced an economic recovery fueled by
poizon [28]
A drastic rise in industry and infrastructure 
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Constitution gives the federal goverment many important duties: making laws, raising money and deciding how to
Mama L [17]

Answer:

National defense is the priority job of the national government.

National defense is the only mandatory function of the national government. Most of the powers granted to Congress are permissive in nature. Congress is given certain authorities but not required by the Constitution to exercise them. For example, Article One, Section Eight gives Congress power to pass a bankruptcy code, but Congress actually did not enact bankruptcy laws until well into the 19th century.

But the Constitution does require the federal government to protect the nation. Article Four, Section Four states that the “United States shall guarantee to every State a republican form of government and shall protect each of them against invasion.” In other words, even if the federal government chose to exercise no other power, it must, under the Constitution, provide for the common defense.

National defense is exclusively the function of the national government. Under our Constitution, the states are generally sovereign, which means that the legitimate functions of government not specifically granted to the federal government are reserved to the states. But Article One, Section 10 does specifically prohibit the states, except with the consent of Congress, from keeping troops or warships in time of peace or engaging in war, the only exception being that states may act on their own if actually invaded. (This was necessary because, when the Constitution was written, primitive forms of communication and transportation meant that it could take weeks before Washington was even notified of an invasion.)

The great irony of our time is that the bigger the federal government has become, the less well it has performed its priority function of providing for the national defense. For example, Congress spent $787 billion in the “stimulus” bill last year, yet not a dime of it was spent on military procurement or modernization—despite the fact that America is in greater danger today than it has been at any time since Communism was threatening Europe in the late 1940s.

The Heritage Foundation has written extensively on the risks facing America and the state of our defenses. Here is a brief summary of the salient facts.

America has no strategy for victory in the war on terrorism—we’re not even calling it a war anymore—and the momentum has shifted to the terrorists. The outcome in Afghanistan is in doubt. If the terrorists succeed there, they can reconstitute their safe havens, plan further attacks on the United States, and threaten to gain control of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal.

The Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism, a bipartisan commission with the status of the 9/11 Commission, found unanimously that the terrorists would “more likely than not” develop and use a weapon of mass destruction against a Western city by 2013. The Director of National Intelligence publicly agreed with that assessment.

The international regime for controlling nuclear weapons is broken. Pakistan has a substantial and growing nuclear arsenal. Its intelligence organization has been penetrated by the Islamists. Both North Korea and Iran are steadily increasing the range, payload, and accuracy of their ballistic missiles. No one seriously believes that the Iranians will voluntarily stop their nuclear program or that the West (except perhaps the Israelis) will use force to stop them.

According to our Pacific commander, China is increasing its military strength far more quickly than our intelligence predicted. The Chinese have already acquired an arsenal of advanced fighters and missiles that threatens to deny the American Navy access to the Taiwan Strait. They are building as many as five submarines per year and have established a modern submarine base on the island of Hainan. They have announced plans to build a variety of the ships necessary to field a blue water capability.  

The American military is significantly weaker than it was at the end of the Cold War.  Most of our tankers are equally as old; they will not be replaced, if at all, until the 2030s. The Department of Defense wants to close our most modern cargo aircraft production line and will close our most sophisticated fighter line. The missile defense budget has been cut, and according to most reports, the Obama Administration will cut modernization budgets even further.

As important as it is for the federal government to restrain itself from interfering where it does not belong, it is equally important that the government perform its constitutionally mandated function of providing for the national defense.

America’s global influence is being checked and rolled back, and even the homeland is no longer safe from attack.

The situation can still be recovered, but only if our leaders understand their duty, regain their confidence, and reenergize the defense of freedom here and abroad.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 3. How does the quotation connect to the Renaissance principle of
    5·1 answer
  • 2) Which event took place FIRST?
    12·1 answer
  • The worst american nuclear disaster in history resulted from a partial reactor meltdown in 1979 at which power plant?
    13·1 answer
  • Who was the commander in the Texas navy in 1839?
    5·2 answers
  • What was Rome’s unmatched technology
    14·1 answer
  • The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941 is an illustration of the
    7·1 answer
  • Modern anthropologists believe Native Americans came to North America in an emigration from Asia about 30,000 years ago.
    15·1 answer
  • The members of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors are selected by the president and confirmed by the __________.
    10·2 answers
  • James Oglethorpe is best described as
    12·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!