Answer:
He was a policeman in New York City.
He was a police officer in New York City.
The chairlady was wearing a beautiful clip in her hair.
The chairperson was wearing a beautiful clip in her hair.
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is B.
Explanation:
The speech specifically talks about justice.
The sentence can be written as Carlos was more disappointed than me when we were both cut from the soccer team. In this sentence, the pronouns are 'me and we ' and both denote nominative pronouns.
A nominative pronoun refers to the subject or clause of a sentence. The subject refers to the person who is being talked about in the sentence. This sentence deals with the subjects 'me and we.' So these will denote the nominative pronouns of the sentence. Pronouns are those words that can be used as the nouns of the sentence we are writing.
The objective pronoun refers to the object of the sentence. For example: Where is the house? It is here. In this sentence, the word ' it ' refers to the object of the sentence. So this is not according to the pronouns given to us in the sentence. So the pronouns will be identified as a nominative pronouns.
Learn more about nominative or objective pronouns here:
brainly.com/question/902291
#SPJ4
The answer is A. It is the only one that isn't a question. Its like saying "I like pizza?" It just doesn't make sense.
Answer: The correct answer for this question is A. "policy" and "provision".
Explanation: Because, the excerpt talks about how the two tribes have accepted the provision made for their removal at the last session of Congress, and it is believed that their example will induce the remaining tribes also to seek the same obvious advantages. Also because, Congress has given pleasure to announce that the benevolent policy of the government, steadily pursued for nearly thirty years, in relation to the removal of the Indians beyond white settlements is approaching to a happy consummation.