In an attempt to reduce the likelihood of a type ii error, the experimenter proposes to recruit a very large group of participants.
In statistical hypothesis testing, a Type I error is actually an incorrect rejection of the true null hypothesis (a.k.a. a "false positive" result or conclusion; e.g., "Innocent person convicted ing"). Rejection of one actually false null hypothesis (also called a "false negative" result or conclusion, e.g. "guilty party not convicted").
Many statistical theories revolve around minimizing one or both of these errors, but unless the outcome is determined by a known and observable causal process, either of these errors can be completely quantified. It is statistically impossible to eliminate You can improve the quality of the hypothesis test by choosing a lower threshold (cutoff) and changing the alpha (α) level. Knowledge of type I and type II errors is widely used in medicine, biometrics, and computer science.
Learn more about type ii error here:
brainly.com/question/16012410
#SPJ4
Answer: Ellen is engaging in conversation not to be left out in their discussion. Ellen made sure she was compelling in her discussion.
Explanation: Ellen was in a gathering of individuals with higher academic degree, in order for her to be involve in conversation she needed to talk about her achievements.
5 mph. explanation: 25 divided by 5 is 5
operational definition term refers to a precise statement of how a conceptual variable is turned into a measured variable
<u>Explanation:</u>
An operational definition is the description of methods the researcher is performing to practice to contain a particular variable. Each valid psychology education comprises an operational definition of the variables in the examination. An operational definition enables the researchers to report in a particular design what they intend when they practice a specific term.
Frequently, operational definitions are accurate and calculable. Particularizing variables in this system enables other characters to understand if the investigation has efficacy. Efficacy here relates to if the researchers are really covering what they proposed to cover.
