Answer:
There will be an increase of $6,200 , If the special order is accepted
Explanation:
For computing the net income effect first we have to find out the net income per scale which is a difference between offer purchase price and variable cost per unit
In mathematically,
Net income = Offer purchase price - variable cost per unit
where,
Offer purchase price is $35
And, the variable cost is $12 per unit plus it incur special shipping charges which is also a part of the variable cost.
So, total variable cost = variable cost per unit + Special shipping charges per scale
= $12 + $1
= $13
So, Net income is
= $15 - $13
= $2 per unit
Now for producing the 3100 scales, the net income should be multiply with the production unit
= Net income × Production unit
= 3,100 × 2
= $6,200
Fixed cost is fixed whether the production level changes or not. Thus, it is not be considered.
Hence, there will be an increase of $6,200 , If the special order is accepted
Answer:
Abstract. Admission rate and length of stay (LOS) are two hospital performance indicators that affect the quality of care, patients' satisfaction, bed turnover, and health cost expenditures. the customer service dashboard reports hospital scores on issues such as meal quality, mortality rate and percentage of transfusions having adverse reactions. FALSEA customer service dashboard provides such scoring information as percentage of patients who would recommend the hospital to others and rating of such items as inpatient parking, courtesy of staff, cleanliness, caring of staff, meal quality, follow-up education and instruction, and pain management, as well as an overall satisfaction. Mortality rate would be reported on the clinical dashboard and percentage of transfusions having adverse reactions.
Explanation:
The answer is false cause you cause just be doing the services for extra money or just for fun
<u>The answer is "1920".</u>
This is how we calculate this;
time = 16 hours
normal processing rate = 2 per minute
so,
Things-in-Process (Queue) = 16 hours x (2 Items/Minute x 60 Minutes)
<u>= 1920</u>
Answer:The Court considers;
1. Was the leaking roof conspicuous for anyone to see.
2. Was it inconspicuous that requires one to be informed of it's existence.
Explanation:
If (1) is the case then the buyer is responsible for the leakage for he his assumed to have noticed it but do not see it as an issue.
If (2) is the case, the broker is responsible for he his expected to have informed the buyer since the leakage is not obvious on the building
