Many Western politicians together with many Germans and ordinary people in the West, as well as in the East, called this wall the wall of shame. It was called like this because an actual wall was built in the middle of a very important and historically significant city to divide it into two halves.
The correct answer for your case is C - many called it a 'wall of shame'.
False, he fled Massachusetts due to fear of being imprisoned
New evidence is discovered & Oversights and errors are corrected
Thats what i personally think because new opinions have to be backed with evidence, while if a piece of evidence is lost or stolen, it doesn't change the arguments because even though it is lost or stolen, there ought to be copies of the original object, but im not sure about new technology being applied to evidence, but it can go either or, its a 50/50 because new technology can enhance historical discoveries, or find new ones, but applying new technology as evidence has to be backed up with facts as to why it should be applied
Judicial review which is linked to the supremacy clause
