Why do justices use precedents in majority opinions and dissents?

History

1 answer:

Mila [183]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

he most important type is the majority opinion. In most cases, a majority opinion requires five Justices, unless one or more Justices have recused themselves from a given decision. The majority opinion is important because it defines the precedent that all future courts hearing a similar case should follow.

HOPE THIS HELPED!!!!!!!!! XDDDDD

You might be interested in

Which of the following is not a characteristic of George Washington

Soloha48 [4]

I think its second one

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How did Chandragupta improve life during the Maurya Empire?

vitfil [10]

Chandragupta improved the lives of his subjects by overthrowing the corrupt Nanda Empire, uniting the continent of India and implementing an efficient national administration. Chandragupta founded the Mauryan Empire in 321 B.C. and ruled until he was succeeded by his son in 298 B.C

7 0

3 years ago

Stalin insisted that all Yugoslavian and Russian citizens be forced to return home following the war, at the conference.

erik [133]

This would be the Yalta Conference.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

When a king or queen says, it is my duty and right to be your king or queen because my power and appointment comes from god and

const2013 [10]

The divine right of kings is the concept that would cause a king or quenn to say that there appointment is from God.

<h3>What is the divine right of kings rule?</h3>

This was a doctrine in the Ancient European times where the monarchy and rulers would claim that they got their rights to be king through God.

By saying this they try to say that no man can hold them accountable for their actions.

Read more on the monarchy here:

brainly.com/question/3710014

8 0

2 years ago

Answer now for brainliest, plz deadline 10 minutes

frosja888 [35]

The correct answer is D; People that are under arrest must be read their rights by law enforcement.

Further Explanation:

When a person is arrested, no matter the age, they must be read their Miranda rights. This informs the person being arrested that they have the right to remain silent and that they can have an attorney. If the person being arrested is not read their Miranda rights, the charges can be dismissed in a trial.

Any type of confession that is given without the rights being read can void that confession in a court of law. The Supreme Court ruled in this case in 1966.

Learn more about Miranda Rights at brainly.com/question/3587626

#LearnwithBrainly

4 0

3 years ago