Answer:
c. rent-seeking behavior
Explanation:
In economics, rent-seeking behavior can be described as a behavior or conduct that tries to increase the share of an economic agent or an entity from the existing wealth without adding or creating new wealth. This implies that the entity aims to obtain added wealth without creating a new one.
From the question, the aim of the lawyers is mainly to increase their own wealth in terms of legal fees they will collect from preparing wills, trusts, and other legal documents when they prepare them for people when a law restrict people from self-preparing it using their personal computers. In turn, the lawyers will only increase their share of wealth without adding any wealth.
Therefore, this is an example of rent-seeking behavior.
I will assume this is a true or false question, the answer is true. Stimulate demand implies make or upgrade request. Request brings about monetary action, so you empower request to animate the economy. I hope the answer will help you..
Answer: Domestic stage
Explanation:
In the domestic stage of production, the entity is only involved in the domestic arena. The production facilities they have are limited to the country they are in and they only operate in the domestic market and at this point, the company is not trying to get into foreign markets.
The grocery store above uses only local distributors which means that they are only servicing the local market which therefore puts them at the domestic stage of globalization.
Answer:
a. "Not deductible"
b. "Not deductible"
c. "Not deductible"
d. "Deductible"
e. "Not deductible"
f. "Not deductible"
Explanation:
Expenses to be deductible ( especially for tax purposes) must pass the WREN test where;
W stands for wholly
R stands for reasonably
E stands for exclusively
N stands for necessarily
Looking at the expenses incurred and paid for by Doug during the year, the $50 ticket for running a red light is not a necessary expense as an adherence to traffic signs would have prevented such an expense. it can also be said that the expense was not reasonably incurred. This also applies to options b and c. Parking at the handicapped space is completely avoidable (necessity test) and as such the $100 would not have been incurred. While the $200 paid to the attorney for representation in court is an offshoot of options a and b. This would not have been incurred if the first two incidences were avoided.
Option c is deductible as the $500 paid is wholly for the business, reasonable, exclusive and necessary. As such, the expense is deductible or allowable. Options e and f are not related to business and are incurred on personal grounds which are avoidable hence, these expenses would not pass the WREN test.
