I believe the answer is <span>. Decoy appliances/vehicles
The majority of this fraud is targeted the people who do not really pay attention to the specs of the product they use.
For example, many repairment targets older people by giving them advice to fix parts of their computer that's working fine.</span>
Answer:
a)
To my view, the MD viewpoint is better. In companies the existing process is usually analyzed and the pain points identified whenever there is a need for change. The new system is simply a change to the existing system. The stakeholders' specific needs are not completely addressed. The MD calls for a collection of and analysis of demands from scratch to share its needs , requirements and inhibitions between the principal stakeholders. The CIO and their staff would be able to assess in the requirements review process what worked and what did not work well for the organization.
In assessing the current process, the CIO and his team will align their thinking process with the pain points and correct the existing system. They are not going to build the system in a fresh light. A new system that meets the needs of stakeholders can be developed. For everybody, this is a win-win situation. The point of view of MD is therefore more logical and related.
b)
In the particular case, the most logical and comprehensive system analysis method is:
Primary stakeholder requirements collection: Primary stakeholders using the system must be consulted on their specific requirements and needs. It is also necessary to consider the limitations identified by stakeholders.
Comprehension of existing system and pain points: the current system can be analysed based on requirements collection and pain points can be emphasized in the current system.
A new system that will win for everyone: the new system must primarily comply with the needs of the stakeholders.
Presentation and approval of the system blueprint to stakeholders
Development and implementation of the system: system development can be carried out by the agile method of sprinting.
Monitoring and control of the system: to check for performance deviations, the system implemented should be observed. In order to monitor deviations, specific intervention can be implemented.
Answer:
German companies do not recognize the profit <u>until the project is completely finished and they have been paid.</u>
Explanation:
German companies prepare their accounting balances under IFRS standards (common for all EU member countries) and German GAAP.
Under IFRS standards, revenue must be recognized when the business satisfies a performance obligation.
German GAAP is very prudent in determining profits, that is why they are only recognized once a project is completely finished and it has been completely paid.
Some specific German rules are to starting to change due to globalization, but others are still subject to legal requirements.
Answer:
$420,000 deferred tax asset
Explanation:
Deferred-tax assets are asset that occurred when company's or organization record income tax is less than the one which is been paid to the tax authority.
Taxable income 3,200,000
Less;Income (per books before income taxes) $2,000,000
Total $1,200,000
Therefore
$1,200,000×35%
=$420,000 deferred tax asset.
Cross record should record $420,000 as a net deferred tax asset or liability for the year ended December 31, 2018
