Under US GAAP, the cash flows that should be included in the Investing Section of the Statement of Cash Flows are purchases of physical assets, investments in securities, or the sale of securities or assets.
This implies that US GAAP does not allow interest paid or received and dividends received to be classified under the Investing Section, unlike IFRS that gives entities the flexibility to classify the above items as either investing or financing activities.
Instead, the US GAAP requires that the above items are classified as operating cash flows.
Thus, the only cash flows that are included in the Investing Section of the statement of cash flows under US GAAP are cash flows (inflows and outflows) related to long-term physical assets and investments.
Learn more about the Investing Section of the statement of cash flows under US GAAP here: brainly.com/question/18568838
Answer:
The contribution margin ratio is closest to 40%
Explanation:
The contribution margin ratio calculates the percentage of sales that will contribute to cover fixed costs and earn a profit. The contribution margin is the difference between the selling price per unit and the variable cost per unit of a product. The contribution margin ratio is the contribution margin per unit represented as a percentage of selling price per unit or total contribution margin represented as a percentage of total sales revenue.
CM Ratio = Total contribution margin / Total Sales revenue
CM ratio = 72000 / 180000 = 0.4 or 40%
Answer:
an increasing number of small businesses realize the power of ... Recurring invoices contribute to a steady stream of monthly income. ... of monthly income from you (and of course their millions of other customers). ... To sustain optimal uptime of the system, they would need to provide monthly support.
Hope this answer helps you :)
Have a great day
Mark brainliest
Answer:
Option B. He will win
Explanation:
If Samuel is desiring to sue his employer in a circuit court because he thinks that the employer was negligent then he will have to sue under negligence Act, which says that the employer is obliged to take all necessary precautions and if found negligent then the court may apply contributory negligent theory as well as comparative negligent theory. These two negligent theories means that the employer was partly responsible for injury, which means that this would result in compensation to Samuel.
Hence it is more likely that Samuel will win the case.
Parking Tickets
Medical Bills
Bank Overdrafts
Hope This Helps!
:D
