There was no '' west '' but people from the south considered it a northern problem. Because in 1812 in American '' west '' only reached as far as the Mississippi River
<span>thermometer is the answer dude
</span>
Well it varied according to time and place but,
<span>Many military personnel who opposed their regime would be killed and political opponents and thousands of others who spoke out against them were sent to the Gulag, a high security labor prison where many died during or shortly after release.</span>
No, I believe that multiple weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation would have hurt America in time. One of the biggest problems was the lack of detail and specific attributes that the Constitution brings from long discussion and debates over what is best for the country. America needed to strengthen it's central government if it wanted to get anywhere, so we may not have become so powerful if we left the majority of the power in the state's hands. Another lacking component was the fact that we had no Executive branch to enforce Congress' laws and no National court to determine the meaning of the laws. Another example is the making of one currency for the entire country. These examples and more could have hurt America if they wouldn't have written the Constitution.
Answer:Domestic applicants are citizens or lawful permanent residents of the United States, or have been granted Asylee, Refugee or Paroled in the Public Interest status by the United States government. Domestic applicants are required to submit a the domestic application fee.
Explanation:
