Yes, people have annotated and closely read a nonfiction text, and No, most of the people never attempted a close reading or annotated a nonfiction piece. Whenever they read nonfiction, I've always felt compelled to write about it.
<h3>How the
nonfiction helps the people?</h3>
- People were able to easily discover key information in the text.
- People were able to figure out what the text's main point was.
- People were able to follow the progression of the text's thoughts and arguments.
<h3 /><h3>How the nonfiction hinders the people?</h3>
- People couldn't figure out what the work was about.
- People couldn't figure out what the text's main point was.
- People just had a rudimentary grasp of how the concepts and arguments were produced.
Thus, Yes, people have annotated and closely read a nonfiction text
For more details about nonfiction helps the people, click here:
brainly.com/question/1830999
#SPJ1
In <em>The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde </em>the duality of human nature is one of the major themes. Stevenson is able to show that humans aren't born inherently bad or good, but somewhere in the middle.
It is a study about the mind of the author and the theories of dualism, and also about human psychology.
It would be B I believe. It is the most logical sentence and it fits the tone.