1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kolbaska11 [484]
3 years ago
13

Name one reason that the native Americans agreed to treaties that were unfair to them

History
2 answers:
blsea [12.9K]3 years ago
7 0
They didn’t understand English well.
andrezito [222]3 years ago
3 0
We have to remember that there was a big difference between the treaties themselves and the paper documents that European-Americans used to record those treaties. For many Native Americans, a treaty was an oral agreement between governments. It was methodically memorized and often sealed with an exchange of gifts. In the eastern part of North America, wampum belts (which were shells strung together to create images) served as official records of these treaties, and were draped over a speaker's body when the treaty was being recited later on, much as Europeans might read aloud the text of a written agreement between two European countries.

For Natives, the oral agreement, along with these wampum belts, WERE the treaty, and the paper document they signed was just some odd European habit that they often simply tolerated. Many of the Native leaders who signed these treaties could not read what they were signing, and even if they could they did not recognize the documents as being the official record of what was agreed on.
You might be interested in
Which advanced technology did Europeans not use to travel west to get across the oceans
goldfiish [28.3K]

Answer:

GPS buddy given if this is about ancient Europeans.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What is the capital of palistine?​
galina1969 [7]

Answer:

Jerusalem

Explanation: I think

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does the phrase “...long twilight struggle…” refer to in this excerpt?
Ronch [10]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

I

8 0
3 years ago
Wassup people wyd hru
Solnce55 [7]
Bajsjshsjsnshsujwsijs
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do you think Lincoln possessed the power to free the slaves in the seceded states? Why or why not?
kaheart [24]
Lincoln had only one reason to fight: to save the Union. In time, however, there was another reason to fight: to free the black people held as slaves in the South.

Today, Kay Gallant and Harry Monroe continue the story of how President Lincoln dealt with this issue.

VOICE ONE:

Lincoln had tried to keep the issue of slavery out of the war. He feared it would weaken the northern war effort. Many men throughout the North would fight to save the Union. They would not fight to free the slaves.

Lincoln also needed the support of the four slave states that had not left the Union: Delaware, Kentucky, Maryland and Missouri. He could not be sure of their support if he declared that the purpose of the war was to free the slaves.

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was a result of actions taken by the house un-American activities committee
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following did Emma Hart Willard accomplish in 1826?
    7·2 answers
  • Why can't all depositors in a bank withdraw all of their money at once
    13·2 answers
  • Cuales fueron las causas que llevaron a la disolucion de la gran colombia
    13·1 answer
  • The only real adult impact in Eleanor's life was
    5·1 answer
  • Please Help Thank You will reward brainliest
    5·2 answers
  • How did the 24th amendment affect african american voting rights?
    11·1 answer
  • The Supreme Court decision “dred Scott v. Stanford” divided the nation over the issue of slavery true or false?
    6·1 answer
  • Select THREE Chinese inventions during the Middle Ages.
    13·1 answer
  • Why is so little known about the early Chinese dynasties?
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!